Scott Olson/ Getty Images

Les responsables politiques peuvent-ils écrire l’histoire ?

STANFORD – « L’histoire ne se répète pas, mais elle aime les rimes », pour reprendre le mot de Mark Twain. Voici des générations que les dirigeants politiques, soucieux de polir leur héritage, s’emploient à vérifier cette affirmation, s’attribuant le mérite de ce qui a réussi et rejetant sur leurs prédécesseurs ou sur leurs opposants les torts de ce qui a échoué.

De nombreux responsables politiques continuent, longtemps après la fin de leur mandat, de tourner les faits à leur avantage. « L’histoire me sera indulgente, car j’ai l’intention de l’écrire », trancha Winston Churchill, qui revendiquait ses faveurs. Et les nombreux volumes de ses mémoires sur la Seconde Guerre mondiale contiennent non seulement ses formules les plus mémorables – « Ils vécurent là leur heure la plus belle » ou « Jamais […] tant d’hommes ne durent autant à si peu » –, ils sont aussi tissés de la justification des décisions qu’il eut à prendre durant le conflit.

 Il est possible que les écrits de Churchill ne soient pas impartiaux ; ils offrent néanmoins, de l’intérieur, des informations et des détails qui se laissent difficilement déduire des notes et des rapports, souvent incomplets et au style guindé. Comme le savent les historiens, les pressions sont grandes pour que la mémoire du passé soit celle que veulent les vainqueurs. Napoléon Bonaparte eut ainsi cette formule : « L’histoire n’est qu’un mensonge que personne ne conteste. »

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now