Nigeria: Debt or Democracy?

CAMBRIDGE: When poor, heavily indebted countries are struggling to make their way from dictatorship to democracy, the actions of rich countries can be decisive. If rich countries insist on debt repayments and austerity measures, they are likely to destroy the social stability needed for a new democracy to take root.

Greed, short-sightedness, and general unconcern among rich countries, however, should never be underestimated. In recent weeks, European countries – and apparently the IMF – have been rejecting the pleas of Nigeria's new democracy to grant it debt reduction. Instead, they say, Nigeria should increase its debt servicing this year, and should abandon its call for debt reduction. The French Government, as organizer of the creditor committee of governments (the so-called Paris Club)bears most responsibility for this egregious policy, but many other governments and international agencies share the blame.

You would think that France, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the IMF would be more aware of recent history. Seven years ago, Nigeria was on a rocky and treacherous course to democratization. A caretaker government was charged with overseeing the transition to national elections in early 1994. Yet in late 1993, the IMF and World Bank pressured Nigeria to eliminate subsidies on domestic petroleum products as part of austerity moves insisted on by its creditors.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.