Ucrania contra los buitres

OXFORD – A todos los problemas de Ucrania se suma otro: no puede pagar a sus acreedores. El país necesita más dinero, una reforma seria y una reprogramación de su deuda. Sin embargo, incluso los mejores esfuerzos del Fondo Monetario Internacional, los Estados Unidos y la Unión Europea para lograrlo se verán perjudicados por los acuerdos de inversión que ellos mismos han presionado a Ucrania –y a muchas otras economías emergentes– a aceptar. De hecho, Ucrania podría enfrentar una sarta de complejos y costosos casos legales.

En los últimos años, los astutos abogados de los acreedores han argumentado que los tratados de inversión otorgan a los tenedores de bonos los mismos derechos que a los inversores extranjeros directos y han logrado contrabandear los casos de deuda soberana para ingresarlos en procedimientos de arbitraje internacional cada vez que encontraron tratados de inversión con definiciones amplias y abiertas. Las recientes experiencias de Argentina, Grecia y Chipre destacan el «reflujo» de la reestructuración de la deuda soberana.

El primero de estos casos fue Abaclat y otros contra la República Argentina, que comenzó en 2008. Miles de tenedores italianos de bonos rechazaron el acuerdo de reestructuración de deuda argentino, argumentando exitosamente que el tratado de inversión entre Italia y Argentina les otorgaba derecho a reclamar una compensación según un arbitraje entre los inversores y el estado.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now