Medvedev doit libéraliser la Russie

MOSCOU - L'élection de Dimitri Medvedev comme président de la Russie était un événement attendu. Mais il n'est pas certain qu'il puisse améliorer la situation économique de la Russie une fois à la tête de l'Etat au mois de mai.

Il est vrai que le gouvernement de Poutine lui transmet une économie apparemment prometteuse. Entre 1999 et 2008, la croissance moyenne a été de 7,2%, les réserves étrangères représentaient 30% du PIB - les troisièmes du monde en valeur absolue - le volume boursier a été multiplié par 20, la classe moyenne achète des voitures étrangères, fréquente les restaurants japonais et part en vacances à l'étranger. Les sondages montrent  que le niveau de satisfaction de la population a augmenté.

Le succès économique de la Russie tient en partie au prix élevé du pétrole et des matières premières. Mais tout ne se résume pas au pétrole. La réforme fiscale de 2001 encourage le travail et limite l'évasion fiscale avec un taux uniforme d'impôt sur le revenu de 13% - l'un des plus bas de la planète. La libéralisation des procédures de création d'entreprise et la limitation des inspections ont crée un climat favorable aux petites entreprises et aux entrepreneurs. Une politique macroéconomique prudente et la réforme du secteur financier ont permis une baisse des taux d'intérêt, favorisé les investissements et dopé la consommation.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/UNBE0GO/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now