Mengele en América

LONDRES – Estamos en 1946. A un lado del Atlántico, abogados americanos están acusando a doctores nazis en Nuremberg de crímenes contra la Humanidad: supuestas “investigaciones” hechas en prisioneros de campos de concentración. Al otro lado del Atlántico, en Guatemala, el Servicio de Salud Pública de los Estados Unidos (SSP) está infectando deliberadamente a prisioneros y pacientes mentales con sífilis en otro “experimento” encaminado a substituir los ineficaces medicamentos utilizados por los soldados durante la guerra que acaba de terminar.

Parece demasiado perverso para ser cierto y, sin embargo, una comisión especial nombrada por el Presidente Barack Obama acaba de confirmar que los experimentos de Guatemala se llevaron a cabo efectivamente. Además, Obama ha pedido perdón públicamente al pueblo de Guatemala, pero, ¿por qué se ha tardado tanto en llegar a esto?

Sesenta y tres años después de los experimentos de Guatemala, una historiadora americana, Susan Reverby, estaba rebuscando entre documentos médicos archivados desde el decenio de 1940. Reverby estaba concluyendo una tarea final en sus dos decenios de estudio de los detestables experimentos Tuskegee del SSP, en los que centenares de hombres afroamericanos que padecían sífilis en su última fase fueron observados, pero no tratados, aun después de que se hubiera descubierto la penicilina. Estaba examinando los documentos de Thomas Parran, director general de Salud Pública de los Estados Unidos entre 1936 y 1948, época en la que la investigación Tuskegee estaba ya en marcha. Se descubrió también el hasta entonces desconocido experimento de Guatemala.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now