Comments 1

杰出的错误

Feb 20, 2014 Mario Livio

巴尔的摩—据说托马斯·爱迪生曾说：“我从没有失败过。我只是发现了10,000种不对的办法。”这句话总结了一条科学研究的基本真理——但这条真理经常被错误地理解。科学——以及其他所有创造性学科——的进步并不是通往答案的笔直大道，而是一条曲折坎坷的道路，其中包括了各种错误的起点和歧路。错误不但是不可避免的；也是创新性思想的必要条件，因为它们为其他探索者指明了方向。

你也许会感到好奇，当今高度竞争、争抢资金、以发表数量和引用数量作为成功的首要标准的科学界能否容忍这些错误。简单的回答是肯定的。事实上，这些错误和过去一样重要——并且不仅仅是学术界才是如此。

事实上，整一套科学方法都建立在发现什么不管用是寻找什么管用的关键这一概念的基础上。任何科学理论都必须是可证伪的，即建立在已有的观察或实验结果的基础上。对于被认为是科学的理论，必须能够产生关于未来观察或实验结果的具体预测。如果这些观察或结果与预测相矛盾，理论就被推翻，或至少需要作出修改。

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

Featured

How Not to Fight Income Inequality

Nov 14, 2018 Ricardo Hausmann
Trump’s Diminishing Power and Rising Rage

Nov 12, 2018 Jeffrey D. Sachs
Why Freedom of Assembly Still Matters

Nov 13, 2018 Jan-Werner Mueller
Are You Buying Oil from Saudi Arabia?

Nov 12, 2018 Peter Singer
A Concert of Indo-Pacific Democracies

Nov 12, 2018 Brahma Chellaney

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 1 in all 1 Comments on this article

Zsolt Hermann Feb 20, 2014

I fully agree.
When we are researching we are not simply shooting straight towards a target, since at the beginning we might have a hypothesis but we still have lot of unknown factors.
In order to reach perfect results we basically have to search, scan the whole of reality to sort out "truth" from "false", leaving only the valuable and useful data at the end.
It is a bit like writing black letters on white paper, we are actually not writing the black letters, but we are examining and separating out the white and what remains are the letters.
But in order for such pure science to prevail we have to change our attitude, today any sorting, repetition, any negative results are deemed failure, as we want results and success right here right now, we only measure results in profit and defeating others in ruthless cmpetition, this is why we are in a multi-faceted global crisis including classical sciences.
Since we only care about our own success and the profit we generate, and how to defend our own findings "against" others regardless of facts, we have long left pure, true scientific principles behind and lost our coordinates.
In order for science to find its way back to the true reality it has to become "innocent" again, disconnected from profit, military applications, wasteful competitions, it has to be for the sake of understanding the objective reality around us.
And since an individual is by default subjective, self-limited thus blind to the multi-dimensional, "quantum" reality around us, science needs to be a very sensitively mutual teamwork, equal and compromise ready scientists working and building something common and mutual in between them.
This all might sound like a utopia right now, but on the other hand scientific research has to be built on strict natural laws, the researchers have to take on "equivalent form" with the reality they are researching in order to understand it, and since today we start to realize nature is integral, interconnected and interdependent, the researchers have to take on the same form in order to achieve true, objective findings.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

http://prosyn.org/lU3wLTb/zh;

杰出的错误

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Featured

How Not to Fight Income Inequality

Trump’s Diminishing Power and Rising Rage

Why Freedom of Assembly Still Matters

Are You Buying Oil from Saudi Arabia?

A Concert of Indo-Pacific Democracies

New Comment

Email this piece to a friend

Contact us

Give Italy’s Government a Chance

Europe’s New Political Battle Lines

The Dred Scott of Climate Change?

The Bank of Japan’s Stealth Tapering

Vaccinating Against Superbugs

Trump’s Protectionist Quagmire

Disaster Capitalism Comes to Puerto Rico

Rethinking Animal Agriculture

Cookies and Privacy

Log in/Register