Making or Breaking Europe

Sweden's thumbs down to the Euro strips bare the fundamental choice now facing Europe. Slowly, very slowly, the European Union is approaching the moment of truth when its members must decide what kind of a Union they want. Do they want a politically integrated Union, perhaps developing eventually into a true federation? Or do they want a loose economic club, based essentially on a single economic market, with a few optional add-ons of a political nature?

This question has faced the EU from its beginning, and until now member governments answered it by proceeding at the pace of the most reluctant. But that may be changing. This year, or next year, it may at last become clear that the gulf between federalists and nationalists is too deep to be bridged. At that point, the federalists will see whether they can find a way to go ahead on their own. If they do, there will be a two-speed Europe, with a politically integrated inner core and others more loosely associated on the outside.

The idea of a two-speed or variable-geometry Union, has long been debated, mainly as a way of finessing the Euro-skeptical foot-dragging of successive British governments. Mostly, these debates tended to reach the morose conclusion that a two-speed Europe would be hopelessly difficult to negotiate. Then, thank goodness, the idea of a variable-geometry Union seemed to lose urgency when Tony Blair came to power.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles from our archive every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.