South Korean activist wearing a mask of North Korean leader Kim Jong-Un

Politics

عشرة دروس من برنامج كوريا الشمالية النووي

Jul 24, 2017 Richard Haass

سيول - لقد أنتجت كوريا الشمالية عددا من الرؤوس الحربية النووية كما تقوم بتطوير صواريخ باليستية قادرة على نقلها لجميع أنحاء العالم. وتحاول حكومات كثيرة منع أو إبطاء التقدم في قدرة كوريا الشمالية وإيجاد طرق لما ينبغي عمله إذا فشلت هذه الجهود.

هذه أسئلة مهمة للغاية، لكنها ليست الوحيدة. ومن المهم أيضا أن نفهم كيف نجحت كوريا الشمالية في النهوض ببرامجها النووية والصاروخية، على الرغم من عقود من الجهود الدولية. وقد يكون الوقت متأخرا جدا للتأثير على مسار كوريا الشمالية بشكل حاسم؛ لكن لم يفت الأوان بعد للتعلم من التجربة. وفيما يلي نجد عشر دروس نتجاهلها.

أولا، تمتلك الحكومة المعرفة العلمية الأساسية والقدرة على التصنيع الحديث، وهي مصممة على تطوير عدد من الأسلحة النووية البدائية. و عاجلا أم آجلا ستنجح بالتأكيد. ومعظم المعلومات ذات الصلة متاحة على نطاق واسع.

To continue reading, register now.

Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.

As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.

Already have an account? Log in

WINTER SALE: Save 25% on a new PS subscription

For a limited time, you can gain greater access to Project Syndicate – including every commentary and our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – starting at less than $6 per month.

Subscribe Now

Richard Haass

Writing for PS since 2000
150 Commentaries

Richard Haass, President of the Council on Foreign Relations, previously served as Director of Policy Planning for the US State Department (2001-2003), and was President George W. Bush's special envoy to Northern Ireland and Coordinator for the Future of Afghanistan. He is the author, most recently, of The Bill of Obligations: The Ten Habits of Good Citizens (Penguin Press, 2023).

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 8 Comments on this article

Barry Rosenfeld Jul 31, 2017

If a "problem" can't be solved , redefine it. Haass wants to manage it, whatever that means. It isn't a strategy, but an admission of defeat.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Mauricio Duran-Loriga Jul 25, 2017

Kim is totally defenseless against US/Chinese striking capabilities. BARE NUDE. It would take 30 minutes to overthrow him. Or less.

In the West, MSM tries to induce a nuclear panic about mad Kim.

However, the first country to ever again detonate a nuclear device will be crushed in full by the international community. With unprecedented unanimity.

Already a third Kim at the top, these guys must be very useful to their masters. That is why the MSM never talks about the dozens of millions of N. Koreans slaughtered or confined to live cattle class lives, for decades and counting. QUI BONO ?
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Yoshimichi Moriyama Jul 24, 2017

I spent as a boy almost everyday frightened with the radio news of the Russo-American belligerent altercation, each threatening the other with nuclear weapons. I learned as a youth a little bit about the theory of nuclear deterrence and game theories and a little bit about Russian history, and I felt a little bit relieved. At that time I little expected such a tiny country as North Korea taking on such a big country as the US on equal terms of temerity.
To think the unthinkable, which it seems Mr. Haass has not thought yet, one solution would be to use tactical nuclear weapons.
- Yoshimichi Moriyama Jul 25, 2017
  
  North Korea can inflict damages on us, so we are deterred. Suppose or imagine that five or ten years later from now North Korea should sell or give its nuclear know-how or biological/chemical weapons to a country in Africa, the Middle East, East Asia or Latin America; what could we do then to prevent it? We would still be deterred then. The theory of deterrence would perfectly apply to us. But what would we have to deter them? What would deter them? Which part of the deterrrenc theory or what kind of game theory would be applicablet to them? If no part of the deterrence theory or game theories should apply to North Korea, what is wrong with these pedantic thinking or its premises?
  
  ...the US that got S Korean to abandon its attempt to gain nuclear weapons and US nuclear weapons left S Korea in 1991...the past attacks by North Korea including the 1983 assassination attempt on the S Korean president in Rangoon that killed 21 people...the bombing of KAL flight 858 in 1987 that killed all 115 people on the flight...the 31 man attack on the S Korean presidential compound in 1968 that killed nearly 100 people (Dennis's comment on EastAsiaForum/Nicol Brodie/June 7/Escalation is not deterrence on the Korean Peninsula, http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2017/06/07/escalation-is-not-deterrence-on-the-korean-penisula/).
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

https://prosyn.org/q7DoZByar

Handpicked to read next

Email required

Password required Remember me?

Facebook

Microsoft

Twitter

عشرة دروس من برنامج كوريا الشمالية النووي

WINTER SALE: Save 25% on a new PS subscription

New Comment

Contact us

Handpicked to read next

Asia’s Hierarchies of Humiliation

Log in/Register

عشرة دروس من برنامج كوريا الشمالية النووي

WINTER SALE: Save 25% on a new PS subscription

Handpicked to read next

Edit Newsletter Preferences

Set up Notification