Is Freedom Enough?

Do democracies need values? The question seems absurd in the light of photographs of American soldiers torturing and humiliating Iraqi prisoners. But the fact is that the advance of democracy historically entailed the erosion of shared values and the rise of individual autonomy. It presupposed moral agnosticism and a plurality of meanings, none of which are sacred or compulsory to all.

Democracy does nurture some common values, but they are overwhelmingly liberal values - in other words, individual rights trump collective obligations. For contemporary democrats, the fullest possible respect for the autonomous individual is, as Thomas Jefferson put it, "self-evident." But are civil, political, and human rights enough to ensure the strength and survival of democracies? Are today's democracies virtuous enough to rally the energies - including self-sacrifice - needed to defeat their enemies?

Such questions were never so urgent in the past, partly because fundamental democratic values were less abstract than they seem nowadays. Such values animated the fight against Nazi and Soviet totalitarianism, fascism, and military dictatorship; in their name, decolonization was achieved, and minorities gained equality and dignity. Democracy's values may be one-sided on behalf of individual rights, but this has also made them universal, legitimizing the struggle against oppression, wherever it is played out.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.