Las opciones de Irán

Berlín -- Con el presidente Bush en Europa intentando convencer a los líderes de la UE de endurecer las sanciones de la ONU contra Irán, y frente al actual debate entre John McCain y Barack Obama sobre si Estados Unidos necesita o no dialogar con los gobernantes de Irán, la cuestión del programa nuclear iraní se está recalentando. Los iraníes, para sorpresa de nadie, están observando este debate con interés. Necesitan hacer algo más que observar.

La elite política de Irán ve a Estados Unidos, más que a Europa, como su contraparte internacional apropiada. Sólo Estados Unidos puede darle a la Republica Islámica las garantías de seguridad que desea ardientemente. Estados Unidos, de hecho, debería estar preparado, llegado el caso, para brindar este tipo de garantías si quiere que Irán interrumpa las partes más sospechosas de su programa nuclear.

Pero Irán debe hacer su parte para que cualquier diálogo futuro con Estados Unidos resulte un éxito. En conversaciones con miembros de la comunidad política de Irán, siempre me asombra que la resolución del conflicto nuclear (o, de hecho, otros problemas en los que Irán tiene participación) sea vista como la responsabilidad principalmente de Estados Unidos, Europa y otras potencias importantes, no de Irán.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now