International Justice Supports National Justice

In recent years, an emerging international system of justice has begun to undermine the old calculus of tyrants and torturers. Recently they could commit their crimes with impunity, bludgeoning their nation's judicial system into submission. Now international war crimes tribunals have been created for Rwanda and former Yugoslavia, national courts have indicted despots from other countries, and a permanent International Criminal Court will soon be established.

Yet international justice is attacked as elitist and undemocratic. Critics complain that home-grown national justice is being replaced by distant, unaccountable international tribunals. Decrying a new legal imperialism, they ask why foreign prosecutors should make critical decisions about justice concerning countries with which they have no personal connection.

Recent experience, however, suggests that, far from supplanting national law enforcement, international justice is beginning to spur toward national prosecutions, reinforcing rather than replacing local efforts.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles from our archive every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.