Au cour du raisonnement nucléaire de l’Iran

MELBOURNE – L’Iran est-elle déterminée à obtenir l’arme nucléaire ? Ou se contentera-t-elle d’une simple capacité nucléaire, susceptible de fabriquer des armes sans pour autant le faire ? La différence a-t-elle de l’importance ?  

Peu de questions internationales englobent des enjeux aussi forts que ceux-la. Si le profond pessimisme qui entoure les intentions iraniennes persiste, la plus grande inquiétude concerne une attaque préventive israélienne qui pourrait engendrer un nouveau conflit majeur au Moyen-Orient avec la probabilité de conséquences dramatiques pour l’économie mondiale.

Personne ne devrait sous-estimer la difficulté d’évaluer les intentions réelles de l’Iran. Et les signaux mitigés de la part de centres de pouvoir concurrents n’aident en rien ; ni d’ailleurs le contraste récurrent entre le discours iranien public, généralement claironnant, et le discours officieux, plutôt plus modéré. Les pessimistes et les sceptiques ont matière à s’inquiéter compte tenu de l’historique de cas d’obstructions et de stratégies de la corde raide de la part de l’Iran par rapport aux inquiétudes légitimes qu’éveillent ses programmes nucléaires. 

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/gOxkISG/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now