If Not Now, Then When?

The last two years have witnessed a cascade of interconnected crises: financial panic, rising food and oil prices, climate shocks, a flu pandemic, and more. As world leaders arrive for the G-8 Summit in Italy, they will have to update their politics to grapple with problems that, more than ever before, none of them can solve alone.

Yangon -- All politics are local, goes the old aphorism.  Today, we can say that all problems are global.  As world leaders meet at the G8 Summit in Italy, they will have to update their politics to grapple with problems that not one of them can solve alone.  
The last few years have been a cascade of interconnected crises: financial panic, rising food and oil prices, climate shocks, a flu pandemic and more.  Political cooperation to address these problems is not a nicety.  It is a global necessity.  
The intensity of global interconnectedness is stunning.  The H1N1 influenza was identified in a Mexican village in April.  It has now reached over 100 countries.  The collapse of Lehman Brothers last September was transmitted worldwide within days. Soon, even the most remote villages in Africa, Asia, and Latin America were feeling the shock of reduced remittance income, cancelled investment projects, and falling export prices. In the same way, climate shocks in parts of Europe, Australia, Asia, and the Americas contributed to soaring food prices that hit the poor and created instability and hardships in dozens of countries.

No nation or world leader can solve these problems alone.  Every country faces worsening climate impacts that result from worldwide greenhouse gas emissions, not just those within national borders.  A recent US government report, for example, warns that business as usual in climate policy will result in severe droughts in the American southwest, intense storms and flooding in the Gulf of Mexico and torrential rains in the northeast.  US politicians will be answerable, but heading off these dire effects requires global agreement.  
This is why I am calling on the G8 to act on a set of crucial issues over the coming twelve months.  Some are within the purview of the G8 countries; others require global agreement by all UN members.  Either way, the G8 leaders have a special obligation to lead, given past commitments, the size of their economies, their disproportionate contributions of greenhouse gas emissions, and their responsibilities as donor countries.  
First, the G8 and other major emitters of greenhouse gases must intensify their work to seal a deal at the UN climate change conference in Copenhagen in December. That agreement must be fair, scientifically rigorous, and comprehensive. The goal: to limit the global mean temperature increase to two degrees Celsius. Achieving this means global emissions must be reduced by at least 50% by 2050, with the G8 and other industrialized countries committing to emissions cuts of at least 80% from 1990 levels.

In the interim, industrialized countries must make the first step by committing to emission reductions of 25-40% below 1990 levels by 2020.  The principles of equity and historical responsibility require no less. That said, developing countries must also move substantially beyond business as usual in cutting their emissions. But they should not have to choose between reducing poverty or reducing emissions. Both are vital.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/t29V063;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now