Paul Lachine

¿Cuán capitalista es Estados Unidos?

CAMBRIDGE – Si la frontera del capitalismo es con el socialismo, sabemos por qué el mundo acierta cuando ve a Estados Unidos como fuertemente capitalista. La titularidad estatal es baja y se la considera una aberración cuando ocurre (como las absorciones por parte del gobierno de General Motors y Chrysler en los últimos años, de las cuales los funcionarios quieren salir a toda prisa). El gobierno interviene en la economía menos que en la mayoría de los países avanzados, y los principales programas sociales como la atención médica universal no están tan profundamente arraigados en Estados Unidos como en otras partes. 

Sin embargo, éstas no son las únicas dimensiones a tener en cuenta cuando se juzga cuán capitalista es Estados Unidos realmente. Consideremos hasta qué punto manda el capital -es decir, los accionistas- en las grandes empresas: si surge un conflicto entre los objetivos del capital y los de los gerentes, ¿quién gana?

Analizado de esta manera, el capitalismo de Estados Unidos se vuelve más ambiguo. La ley estadounidense les da más autoridad a los gerentes y a los directores corporativos que a los accionistas. Si los accionistas quieren decirles qué hacer a los directores -digamos, pedir prestado más dinero y expandir el negocio, o cerrar la fábrica deficitaria-, bueno, no pueden hacerlo. La ley es clara: la junta de directores de la corporación, no sus accionistas, rige el negocio.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now