Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

垄断的新时代

纽约—200年来,关于什么决定了收入分配——以及经济如何运行——的问题,有两大思想流派。其一滥觞于亚当·斯密和十九世纪自由主义经济学家,关注焦点是竞争市场。其二认识到斯密式的自由主义导致了财富和收入的迅速集中,将出发点放在了无限制的市场导致垄断的思想上。了解这两大流派很重要,因为我们关于政府政策和现存不平等性的观点取决于我们认为其中哪个流派能更好地描述现实。

对十九世纪自由主义者及其追随者来说,因为市场是竞争性的,所以个体的回报与他们的社会贡献——用经济学家的话说,就是“边际产品”——有关。资本家因为储蓄而不是消费而获得回报——用我的牛津大学德鲁蒙德(Drummond)政治经济学讲席教授前辈拿骚·西尼尔(Nassau Senior)的话说,是因为他们的节制(abstinence)。因此,收入差异被归因于个人所拥有的“资产”——人力和金融资本。因此,不平等性学者将焦点集中在资产的分配上,包括它们如何在代际间传递。

第二个思想流派以“权力”为起点——包括实施垄断控制或在劳动力市场上对工人的威权。这一领域的学者将焦点集中在是什么导致了权力,权力如何维持和强化,以及可能阻止市场竞争的其他因素。对源于信息不对称的剥削的研究工作便是一个重要的例子。

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/kOT1QOK/zh;
  1. Television sets showing a news report on Xi Jinping's speech Anthony Wallace/Getty Images

    Empowering China’s New Miracle Workers

    China’s success in the next five years will depend largely on how well the government manages the tensions underlying its complex agenda. In particular, China’s leaders will need to balance a muscular Communist Party, setting standards and protecting the public interest, with an empowered market, driving the economy into the future.

  2. United States Supreme Court Hisham Ibrahim/Getty Images

    The Sovereignty that Really Matters

    The preference of some countries to isolate themselves within their borders is anachronistic and self-defeating, but it would be a serious mistake for others, fearing contagion, to respond by imposing strict isolation. Even in states that have succumbed to reductionist discourses, much of the population has not.

  3.  The price of Euro and US dollars Daniel Leal Olivas/Getty Images

    Resurrecting Creditor Adjustment

    When the Bretton Woods Agreement was hashed out in 1944, it was agreed that countries with current-account deficits should be able to limit temporarily purchases of goods from countries running surpluses. In the ensuing 73 years, the so-called "scarce-currency clause" has been largely forgotten; but it may be time to bring it back.

  4. Leaders of the Russian Revolution in Red Square Keystone France/Getty Images

    Trump’s Republican Collaborators

    Republican leaders have a choice: they can either continue to collaborate with President Donald Trump, thereby courting disaster, or they can renounce him, finally putting their country’s democracy ahead of loyalty to their party tribe. They are hardly the first politicians to face such a decision.

  5. Angela Merkel, Theresa May and Emmanuel Macron John Thys/Getty Images

    How Money Could Unblock the Brexit Talks

    With talks on the UK's withdrawal from the EU stalled, negotiators should shift to the temporary “transition” Prime Minister Theresa May officially requested last month. Above all, the negotiators should focus immediately on the British budget contributions that will be required to make an orderly transition possible.

  6. Ksenia Sobchak Mladlen Antonov/Getty Images

    Is Vladimir Putin Losing His Grip?

    In recent decades, as President Vladimir Putin has entrenched his authority, Russia has seemed to be moving backward socially and economically. But while the Kremlin knows that it must reverse this trajectory, genuine reform would be incompatible with the kleptocratic character of Putin’s regime.

  7. Right-wing parties hold conference Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images

    Rage Against the Elites

    • With the advantage of hindsight, four recent books bring to bear diverse perspectives on the West’s current populist moment. 
    • Taken together, they help us to understand what that moment is and how it arrived, while reminding us that history is contingent, not inevitable


    Global Bookmark

    Distinguished thinkers review the world’s most important new books on politics, economics, and international affairs.

  8. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin Bill Clark/Getty Images

    Don’t Bank on Bankruptcy for Banks

    As a part of their efforts to roll back the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, congressional Republicans have approved a measure that would have courts, rather than regulators, oversee megabank bankruptcies. It is now up to the Trump administration to decide if it wants to set the stage for a repeat of the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.