Innover ou stagner

DUBAÏ – Comme les êtres humains, les entreprises vieillissent avec le temps. Elles naissent petites et s’efforcent de survivre, poussées par l’énergie de la jeunesse et par des idées nouvelles. Elles se font concurrence, s’étendent, murissent, et en fin de compte, à quelques exceptions près, sombrent dans l’obscurité. Or, ceci vaut également pour les États : eux aussi peuvent être amenés à perdre la soif de vivre et l’ambition de la jeunesse, et finalement se reposer sur leurs lauriers.

Songez que seules 11 % des entreprises qui figuraient au Fortune 500 en 1955 existent encore aujourd’hui, l’espérance de maintien des entreprises dans ce top 500 ayant chuté de 75 ans à seulement 15 ans en moyenne. En cette époque de changement rapide, celles qui restent à la traîne risquent de sombrer en un éclair. Ceux des États dont la gouvernance prend de l’âge s’exposent au même sort que les entreprises les plus obsolètes. Ainsi leur choix est-il simple : innover ou sombrer.

La course à la compétitivité entre les nations est aussi féroce que la concurrence que se livrent les entreprises sur le marché. Les États s’efforcent d’attirer les investissements, les talents, la croissance et les opportunités, au sein d’un monde globalisé, et ceux qui demeurent hors course sont alors privés des plus précieuses récompenses : développement humain, prospérité, et bonheur de leur citoyens.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/EYoRDGH/fr;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now