From Financial to Democratic Crisis in Asia

JAKARTA: Political crisis has replaced financial crisis in Southeast Asia. President Estrada of the Philippines, who never mastered his office, was removed in a bloodless coup aided by mob rule. Now Indonesia’s President Wahid faces possible impeachment; so, too, may Taiwan’s president. Thailand’s new prime minister assumed office surrounded by scandal, Malaysia’s politics seem more unsettled than at any time in twenty years.

Southeast Asia’s boom years are gone, but this is not to say that they have vanished forever, for the causes of this instability are not hidden. Today’s political turbulence, indeed, has the same roots as yesterday’s financial storms: inadequate, unsound, and unformed institutions. Unless these institutional gaps are addressed, Asian societies will not get back on track.

Of course, finance and democracy are not twins. Yet parallels exist: without the checks and balances of sound domestic institutions, the global winds of political liberalization unsettle former authoritarian regimes, much as economic globalization wrecked havoc on weak financial institutions. Indeed, important lessons can be drawn from Asia’s economic crisis of 1997-98 for today’s political tumult.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.