Apocalipsis fiscal ahora

Cuando el apoyo al Presidente George W. Bush en los Estados Unidos se ha desmoronado en el último año, tal vez el elemento más sorprendente sea la rebelión de los economistas y observadores de la política económica. La semana pasada, Peggy Noonan, redactora de discursos para el Presidente Reagan y para el primer presidente Bush, declaró en el Wall Street Journal que, si hubiera sabido cuál iba a ser la política fiscal de George W. Bush, habría votado a Al Gore en las elecciones presidenciales de 2000.

"Si hubiera pensado [que George W. Bush] era un republicano inclinado a gastar con creces, al estilo de Rockefeller... no lo habría votado...", escribió Noonan. Bush "sí que se presentó como un conservador... [y] el conservadurismo es hostil, por razones que van desde las abstractas y filosóficas hasta las concretas y prácticas, al gasto y los impuestos elevados..." Y después cae en una desesperación casi total: "El Sr. Bush no tendrá que volver a presentarse nunca más como candidato, por lo que está en condiciones de dar un paso adelante y abogar, aunque sólo sea retóricamente, por la aminoración y reducción del gasto. No lo ha hecho y no hay señales de que vaya a hacerlo..."

Noonan no está del todo en lo cierto. George W. Bush no se presentó como un conservador normal, sino como algo que llamó "conservador compasivo", con lo que preservó cierta ambigüedad. Algunos se centraron en lo de "conservador": esperaban del Gobierno de Bush que la política fiscal controlara el gasto y eliminase muchos programas para financiar unas reducciones importantes de los impuestos.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/4mnAatZ/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now