rajan73_JIM WATSONAFP via Getty Images_jerome powell

الأفخاخ النقدية والتضخمية

Nov 23, 2021 Raghuram G. Rajan

شيكاغوـ تشهد الولايات المتحدة ارتفاعا في أسعار السلع والخدمات، ويمكن أيضًا أن نلاحظ تضخما في مدخلات الأعمال واسعة النطاق مثل النقل، والطاقة، والعمالة المتزايدة. فما نوع ردة الفعل التي ينبغي لنا توقعها من محافظي البنوك المركزية؟

ومن جانبه، شدد مجلس الاحتياطي الفيدرالي الأمريكي على أنه لن يفكر في رفع أسعار الفائدة إلا بعد أن يُتِم عملية تقليص مشترياته الشهرية من الأصول، وسيحدث ذلك في وقت ما في شهر يوليو/تموز 2022 بنفس وتيرة التقليص الحالية. ومع ذلك، بعض أعضاء اللجنة الفيدرالية للسوق المفتوحة الفيدرالية التي تحدد معدل الفائدة في بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي قلقون من أن البنك المركزي قد يتخلف عن المنحنى بحلول ذلك الوقت، مما يجبره على رفع أسعار الفائدة بصورة مفاجئة إلى مستويات أعلى، ولفترة أطول مما كان متوقعًا. ومن ثم، أشار نائب رئيس بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي، ريتشارد كلاريدا، مؤخرًا إلى أن الاحتياطي الفيدرالي قد يفكر في تسريع عملية التقليص التدريجي (حتى يتمكن من رفع أسعار الفائدة قريبًا) عندما يجتمع أعضاؤه مرة أخرى في ديسمبر/كانون الأول.

وعلى الرغم من المخاوف المتزايدة (ولكن غير المعلنة في كثير من الأحيان) في بنك الاحتياطي الفيدرالي، فإن محافظي البنوك المركزية في الوقت الحاضرلا يترددون في اعتبار التضخم مشكلة. ففي الماضي، كانت مستويات التضخم الحالية ستدفعهم إلى رفع هاماتهم، والنظر بحزم إلى كاميرات التلفزيون والقول، "نحن نكره التضخم، وسوف نتصدى له"- أو كلمات بهذا المعنى. لكن من المرجح الآن أن يختلقوا أعذارا تفسر التضخم، ويؤكدون لعامة الناس أنه سيختفي بكل بساطة.

To continue reading, register now.

As a registered user, you can enjoy more PS content every month – for free.

Subscribe now for unlimited access to everything PS has to offer.

Already have an account? Log in

Subscribe to Project Syndicate

Enjoy unlimited access to the ideas and opinions of the world’s leading thinkers, including long reads, book reviews, topical collections, short-form analysis and predictions, and exclusive interviews; every new issue of the PS Quarterly magazine (print and digital); the complete PS archive; and more. Subscribe now to PS Premium.

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 13 Comments on this article

Emilio Zuniga Nov 30, 2021

Inflation is all over the world. The main force behind it is supply bottle necks. Therefore, monetary policies though necessary will have a limited effect to dump it. Interest rises need to be carefully set, otherwise, it could feed rising inflationary expectations .
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Jeff Graubart Nov 28, 2021

One unexpected side effect of the Fed's monetary policy is the creation of supply shocks. This is due to the ratio of capital costs between large corporations who can issue bonds (and zombie companies that have the connections to issue bonds) and the capital costs to small and mid-sized business that must borrow from a bank. In an environment where real interest rates are negative, that ratio is "beyond infinity" if such a concept exists. Small businesses pay a positive real interest rate while huge corporations are given money to borrow. This is driving small business to ruin. While major corporations pick up the most profitable aspects of the ruined businesses, some goods and even more services go unmet, leading to supply shocks. The resulting inflation proves that in the very long run, money is still neutral and though it is cliche, the day of reckoning is upon us.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Frans Withofs Nov 28, 2021

In my opinion central banks have created moral hazards favour of governments and of the financial industry:
1) for governments since 2008 with the continuous massive implementation of QE by creating huge amounts of excess reserves( what is this kind of monetary policy...?). By doing so monetary policy became subordinate to fiscal policy and central banks independence became merely a façade. Former central bankers were well aware that fiat money needs a strong and independent central bank.
2) since Greenspan the financial industry knows very well that the central bank will not let them fall and that in the end they will receive the necessary backing.

Well, yes, I agree central banks are in an uncomfortable position( by their own doing) and they will have to move very carefully.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Dallas Weaver, Ph.D. Nov 26, 2021

From the viewpoint of a retired person with no pension beyond SS, I depend upon my savings to survive my last decade (if things go well). As was considered prudent for someone in my position, my savings are in actual savings and bonds and only some equities. I view the government-created inflation as a form of theft of my savings.

Inflation is a very cruel theft of savings.

More importantly, it destroys long-term economic planning to the detriment/destruction of society. How do you make rational physical asset decisions and compute IRR for various life products, especially with long lifetimes (like solar power systems) when you face an unknown value of money. When inflation hits the instability point, long-term rational investments in real assets become impossible to the point where people just buy rebar as a store of value (witnessed this in Brazil years ago) that rusts in their yards.

Unlike other countries like Turkey where people can use dollars, where do we run to? China, Japan, or Europe?
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Thaomas H Nov 25, 2021

I'm not aware that the Fed had any "difficulty" in keeping average inflation up at its target rate. It could have used QE more vigorously, abandoned paying IOR, and certainly need not have raised ST rates when average inflation since 2008 was still below target. Nor is there any difficulty in promptly eliminating its purchase of LT bonds. Not doing so looks like a mistake, but not because it is facing a "difficulty."
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Paul Friesen Nov 24, 2021

"When rates move up, the Fed itself will have to start paying higher rates, reducing the dividend it pays the government and increasing the size of the fiscal deficit."

Huh? Perhaps my omniscience is not quite complete, but I thought the FED owns government bonds, and if the interest rate on those bonds goes up, the FED gets more interest, increasing the dividend it pays. Can anybody enlighten me? Or is the author wrong?
- Leon Myburgh Nov 25, 2021
  
  The reference is to all the reserve deposits of the banking sector with the Fed, on which the Fed pays interest. This is thanks to the quantitative easing that has taken place. The recipients are the commercial banks in this case.
  - Paul Friesen Nov 25, 2021
    
    Thanks. Seems to make sense. But is it not true that the central bank gets more interest from the government, (which it then pays back to the government as its profit)? Any idea how of the magnitude of that flow compares to the magnitude of the total interest paid on excess reserves?
    - Leon Myburgh Nov 27, 2021
      
      Indeed, the Fed does own a huge amount of securities (Treasuries and MBS). My understanding is that most of these securities are fixed rate, so higher rates do not equal higher interest income, unless they mature and are reinvested. Higher yields may even lead to mark-to-market losses, depending on the accounting structure used. The interest rate on the reserve accounts, however, is linked to the Fed Funds rate, so if interest rates go up, the interest paid goes up.
      - Paul Friesen Nov 27, 2021
        
        My understanding is that the FED buys very short-term government bonds, I think on the order of months. So if interest rates go up, it will soon be paying more interest to the government.
        
        I guess I should do some research on this if I really want the answer. Just too lazy and too many other things to do. But your point about the interest on excess reserves is well taken. I know it is true that they shot up to completely unprecedented levels following 2008.
        
        A new reply to this comment has been posted.
      A new reply to this comment has been posted.
    A new reply to this comment has been posted.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Shola Ogunniyi Nov 24, 2021

#Catch 22 .

It seems the best options will be hoping the scenario of post 2008 financial crises played out via disinflationary waves by China and other emerging markets. Or the world should learn to live with higher inflation rates. Or perhaps a global rebalancing in wealth distribution is required, because the recent wealth amassed by the utmost rich in the global north was primarily as a result of the huge accommodating money policies. Asset prices are so elevated without solid fundamental justifications. Will the Central Banks prick the asset prices ?
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
B Wilds Nov 23, 2021

We might soon be witness to the first global inflationary depression.Several factors make this scenario possible, they are outlined below. If this does occur, fortunes will be made and lost. As investors shift into assets that do well during times of inflation, it is possible they may set in motion a self-feeding loop or cycle. More about this in the following article.

https://brucewilds.blogspot.com/2021/03/the-first-global-inflationary.html
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

https://prosyn.org/1o6L54xar

الأفخاخ النقدية والتضخمية

Subscribe to Project Syndicate

New Comment

Email this piece to a friend

Contact us

Log in/Register

الأفخاخ النقدية والتضخمية

Subscribe to Project Syndicate

Edit Newsletter Preferences

Set up Notification