Quitar importancia a 4.300 millones de dólares

LONDRES – En el pasado mes de noviembre, la Autoridad de Conducta Financiera (ACF) del Reino Unido anunció una resolución por la que seis bancos serían sancionados con un total de 4.300 millones de dólares por haber manipulado el mercado de divisas y, sin embargo, los precios de las acciones apenas reaccionaron. ¿Por qué?

Las infames usos y fallos de gestión descubiertos durante una investigación que duró un año y de resultas de la cual se impusieron las sanciones fueron escandalosos. Unos intercambios entre operadores venales, por correo electrónico y charlas electrónicas, propios de semianalfabetos revelaron conspiraciones desvergonzadas para amañar el tipo de cambio “fijo” vespertino a fin de obtener provecho y ganancias personales. Algunos altos cargos se mostraron tan despreocupados, que permitieron a sus empleados actuar como niños vulgares remunerados con salarios excesivos. Con apodos como “los tres mosqueteros” y “el equipo A”, hicieron lo que les apetecía, con un costo enorme para sus entidades.

Pero, pese a la enorme sanción de la ACF, no se obligó a ningún alto cargo a hacerse el harakiri y los inversores apenas hicieron otra cosa que encogerse de hombros. Naturalmente, se debió en parte a que se sabía que la resolución estaba próxima; sólo los detalles de los delitos y la magnitud de las sanciones fueron noticia.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/FDNhJsC/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now