Europe's Culture of Euthanasia

Modern technology has created the possibility of dramatically extending human life, but also a host of new practical and moral problems in the process. Extending life is costly both because the technology itself can be expensive, but also because it often is extremely labor intensive in countries where labor is not cheap.

In capitalist societies, the high price tag associated with these new ways to extend life means that the poor and even the middle class can be excluded from important new benefits. Humanitarian and moral concerns demand that this problem be addressed adequately. Free market critics, sensitive to the problem of excluding people from living a longer life simply because of their income, look to the welfare states of Northern Europe for guidance, because they do not use the price system to allocate healthcare.

But the welfare states' experience with extending life creates its own ethical problems that may be even more serious than those in more market-oriented societies. Faced with bloated fiscal deficits, today's newly cost-conscious welfare states are economizing in the use of expensive life-extending technologies. Moreover, as a result of policies allowing medically-assisted termination of human life, a “culture of euthanasia” has been gaining ground in some Northern European countries. Life-extending technologies are increasingly out of fashion, and terminating ill old people's lives is often extolled as caring, even “humanitarian.”

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.