Down And Out In Madrid

PARIS: The Madrid summit of the Atlantic Alliance has spoken: the Czech Republic, Poland, and Hungary are admitted to the western security club. Other postcommunist applicants have been told to wait their turn. The sense of isolation their current rejection by NATO will bring is worrying, and not only for them.

Today, NATO decisionmaking appears dominated by a fear of Russia’s reaction to enlargement. Negotiations over expansion seemed designed more to buy Russian toleration than to further the interests of those countries directly concerned. The consequences of this process are likely to be most spectacular, at least in the short run, not in the elected few but in the rejected many. Yet they are the ones with the least power to force consideration of their interests.

In the Czech Republic and in Hungary (but not Poland) enthusiasm for accession into NATO is mixed: the public knows that membership entails no magic solution for their problems and that, in the first phase, it will entail as many costs as benefits. But the consequences of rejection for the unsuccessful applicants, while more debatable and complex, are likely to be more spectacular, in political and psychological terms. Russia may consider that they have been consigned to its sphere of influence.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles from our archive every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/rsUHiXk;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.