Does Clinton Deserve Credit for US Prosperity?

CAMBRIDGE: A pivotal question to be debated in this year’s US presidential election is whether American prosperity resulted from Clinton Administration policies or from deeper changes arising from new technology and globalization. In short, should Bill Clinton or Bill Gates get the credit for America’s boom?

The economic successes of Clinton’s eight years are undoubted. America enjoys its longest continuous economic expansion in history, now more than nine years old. Economic growth averaged 3.6% per year between 1992-1999, far above the 2.9% per year growth between1980-92. 15 million jobs were created between 1992 and 1999; the unemployment rate, now 4%, is the lowest in 30 years. The stock market’s performance is legendary, with capital gains totaling 7 trillion dollars since the start of 1996.

No government, of course, could be fully responsible for such large trends. Still, the Clinton Administration was more than a bystander. For President Clinton took a favorable inheritance B the results of the policies of previous governments, as well as global trends and innovations in science and technology B and skillfully fashioned an economic governance well designed for a knowledge based economy. His Administration deserves much credit, both for policies followed and mistakes avoided.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/hc2qs0W;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.