Paul Lachine

El drama de la democracia en el teatro del terrorismo

CAMBRIDGE – El presidente George W. Bush era famoso por proclamar la promoción de la democracia como un eje central de la política exterior estadounidense. Esta retórica no le era exclusiva. La mayoría de los presidentes norteamericanos desde Woodrow Wilson hicieron pronunciamientos similares.

De manera que se produjo una diferenciación sorprendente cuando la secretaria de Estado Hillary Clinton prestó testimonio ante el Congreso a comienzos de este año sobre las "tres D" de la política exterior estadounidense -defensa, diplomacia y desarrollo-. La "D" de democracia estuvo manifiestamente ausente, lo que sugirió un cambio de política fundamental del gobierno del presidente Barack Obama.

Tanto Bill Clinton como George W. Bush solían referirse a los beneficios de la democracia para la seguridad. Mencionaban investigación en el área de las ciencias sociales que demostraba que las democracias rara vez se enfrentan entre sí en una guerra. Pero los académicos han comprobado, y manifestado en términos más meticulosos, que las democracias liberales casi nunca se enfrentan entre sí en una guerra. De hecho, podría ser que una cultura constitucional liberal sea más importante que el mero hecho de llevar a cabo elecciones competitivas.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now