Paul Lachine

Das Drama der Demokratie im Theater des Terrorismus

CAMBRIDGE – US-Präsident George W. Bush war bekannt dafür, die Förderung der Demokratie in den Mittelpunkt der amerikanischen Außenpolitik zu stellen. Mit seiner Rhetorik stand er nicht allein da. Die meisten US-Präsidenten seit Woodrow Wilson haben ähnliche Aussagen gemacht.

Daher war es auffällig, als US-Außenministerin Hillary Clinton in diesem Jahr gegenüber dem Kongress von den “drei D’s” der amerikanischen Außenpolitik sprach – Verteidigung (defense), Diplomatie und Entwicklung (development). Das “D” der Demokratie glänzte durch Abwesenheit, was ein Zeichen für eine grundlegende politische Richtungsänderung der Regierung von Präsident Barack Obama ist.

Sowohl Bill Clinton als auch George W. Bush sprachen oft von den sicherheitspolitischen Vorteilen der Demokratie. Sie zitierten sozialwissenschaftliche Erkenntnisse, die besagen, dass Demokratien kaum jemals gegeneinander Krieg führen. Genauer gesagt haben Wissenschaftler gezeigt, dass liberale Demokratien fast nie gegeneinander Krieg führen. Tatsächlich könnte eine liberale Verfassungskultur entscheidender sein als die simple Tatsache freier Wahlen.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/214YPhS/de;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now