¿Adiós a las armas nucleares?

BERLÍN – Como lo han demostrado recientemente las cumbres de las Naciones Unidas y Washington, el desarme y el control de armas nucleares se encuentran entre los principales temas de la agenda política mundial. Es probable que en el futuro inmediato lo sigan siendo. En efecto, en 2010 se determinará si la visión del presidente estadounidense, Barack Obama, de un mundo sin armas nucleares continuará siendo una esperanza lejana pero viable o deberá abandonarse.

Nadie debe hacerse ilusiones. Aunque todos los Estados con armas nucleares del mundo adopten la visión de un mundo libre de la amenaza de un conflicto nuclear, las armas nucleares seguirán con nosotros durante dos décadas por lo menos, e incluso ello requeriría de las condiciones más favorables para el desarme.

Este año es de una importancia crucial. El acuerdo firmado a principios de abril en Praga entre Rusia y los Estados Unidos sobre la reducción de armas nucleares estratégicas y posiblemente sobre nuevos recortes se acompañó de la publicación del informe Nuclear Posture Review que identifica la capacidad nuclear que la administración Obama desea preservar para los próximos cuatro años. La conferencia de evaluación del Tratado de No Proliferación Nuclear empezará con la tarea de adaptar el TNP a nuestro mundo que cambia rápidamente. Muchos encargados del diseño de las políticas esperan que en 2010 haya más claridad respecto de los programas nucleares de Corea del Norte e Irán.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now