Corruption and Liberalization

Corruption is one of Africa's endemic problems. Indeed, it is a key issue in Nigeria's approaching presidential election, given President Obasanjo's high-minded but failed struggle to curb it. But the winds of globalization were supposed to blow away the cobwebs of bribery and inefficiency. Harvard political scientist Devesh Kapur suggests why this is not happening.

Evict the state from direct economic activity, curb its discretionary powers, and both economic efficiency and governance will improve. Developing countries have been nagged about this for years. By opening economies to international competition and investment, governments will supposedly become disciplined because they will be watched over by international financial capital.

There is undoubtedly merit in shrinking the size of government and making it less intrusive. Uganda is a case in point that this can bring early benefits. Yet official corruption has clearly not declined in the way liberalization's promoters said it would, nor has governance improved markedly for the better in most countries. Why?

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.