Corrupción y liberalización

La corrupción es uno de los problemas endémicos de Africa. En efecto, es un asunto clave en las próximas elecciones presidenciales en Nigeria, dada la lucha ambiciosa pero fallida del presidente Obasanjo para frenarla. Pero se suponía que los vientos de la globalización arrastrarían las telarañas del soborno y la ineficiencia. Devesh Kapur, experto en ciencias políticas de Harvard, trata de explicar por qué eso no está sucediendo.

Al eliminar la participación directa del Estado en las actividades económicas y al limitar sus poderes discrecionales, tanto la eficiencia económica como la administrativa mejorarán. A los países en desarrollo se les ha repetido esa cantaleta durante años. Al abrir las economías a la competencia y la inversión internacionales, los gobiernos supuestamente se harán disciplinados, ya que el capital financiero internacional los estará vigilando.

Sin duda reducir el tamaño del gobierno y hacerlo menos intervencionista tiene sus ventajas. Uganda es un ejemplo de que eso puede traer beneficios a corto plazo. Sin embargo, es claro que la corrupción no ha disminuído de la manera que los promotores de la liberalización dijeron que lo haría, y la administración tampoco ha mejorado notablemente en la mayoría de los países. ¿Por qué?

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now