Consolidation or Competition for Financial Regulators?

How many financial regulatory agencies does a country need? One? Two? Perhaps three or four? How about two hundred? Such questions are gaining in urgency as more and more countries, and the European Union itself, debate whether or not to consolidate financial regulation under the umbrella of one all-powerful body.

Financial regulators' activities focus on maintaining the integrity of a country's financial system: its financial institutions and financial transactions. Their domain encompasses banks, other depository institutions, insurance companies, securities firms, pension funds, finance companies - indeed, just about any entity that conducts financial transactions. The current trend is for countries to consolidate their financial regulatory apparatus into a single agency, with Britain's Financial Services Agency (FSA) a leading example.

I believe that this trend is a serious mistake which, quite myopically, overlooks the potential for mistakes in regulation. Though I do not necessarily advocate 200 financial regulatory agencies (more about this below), I believe that a structure involving multiple financial regulators in a country is likely to create a healthier financial system than would a single all-encompassing regulator.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To access our archive, please log in or register now and read two articles from our archive every month for free. For unlimited access to our archive, as well as to the unrivaled analysis of PS On Point, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy, which describes the personal data we collect and how we use it.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.