El círculo vicioso del crecimiento chino

LONDRES – La mayoría de los economistas están preocupados por la economía china, y por diferentes motivos: falta de consumo y grandes superávit externos, exceso de capacidad industrial, deterioro del medio ambiente, intervenciones del gobierno (por ejemplo, control de capitales y represión financiera). Pero muchos no se dan cuenta de que sólo son síntomas de un único problema básico: las distorsiones del modelo de crecimiento de China.

Hasta cierto punto, el modelo es una creación política, resultado de una arraigada preferencia por la construcción y las manufacturas como motores principales del desarrollo económico. Predilección que trae reminiscencias del Gran Salto Adelante de los cincuenta, cuando la gente se puso a fundir chatarra para cumplir unas metas de producción de acero exageradamente optimistas y propiciar el sueño de Mao de una veloz industrialización.

Hoy, la propensión de China hacia la producción industrial se manifiesta en proyectos fabriles y de infraestructura a gran escala, alentados por subsidios públicos directos e indirectos. Como este enfoque estimula la inversión y genera recaudación impositiva para los gobiernos locales, tiene un impacto positivo más inmediato en el PIB que tratar de desarrollar el sector servicios.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now