La negativa de Ucrania

BRUSELAS – A veces la historia puede pasarse de irónica. Esta semana, mientras los ucranianos conmemoraban el 80.° aniversario del Holodomor (la gran hambruna impuesta por Stalin a Ucrania), el gobierno del presidente Víktor Yanukóvich anunció su decisión de no firmar un acuerdo integral de libre comercio con la Unión Europea en la cumbre de Vilnius del 28 de noviembre. Parece que Ucrania desechó de un día para el otro la oportunidad de superar su traumático pasado.

La causa manifiesta del rechazo de Yanukóvich es la demanda de la Unión Europea de permitir que la ex primera ministra Yulia Timoshenko (quien cumple una condena a siete años de prisión) viaje a Alemania a recibir tratamiento médico. Aunque el Tribunal Europeo de Derechos Humanos dictaminó que Timoshenko es una presa política, Yanukóvich (dotado de pleno poder para conceder indultos) se ha negado a acceder a su liberación. El motivo principal de su negativa es impedir que Timoshenko se presente a la elección para la presidencia de Ucrania en 2015.

El rechazo de Yanukóvich a Europa tal vez fuera previsible, en vista de otras conductas suyas (como el encarcelamiento de sus opositores) que son difícilmente reconciliables con las normas democráticas y los valores europeos. Pero lo que selló el destino del acuerdo con la Unión Europea fue una serie de reuniones que Yanukóvich mantuvo hace poco con el presidente ruso Vladímir Putin.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now