US President-elect Joe Biden may have promised a “return to normalcy,” but the truth is that there is no going back. The world is changing in fundamental ways, and the actions the world takes in the next few years will be critical to lay the groundwork for a sustainable, secure, and prosperous future.
For more than 25 years, Project Syndicate has been guided by a simple credo: All people deserve access to a broad range of views by the world’s foremost leaders and thinkers on the issues, events, and forces shaping their lives. At a time of unprecedented uncertainty, that mission is more important than ever – and we remain committed to fulfilling it.
But there is no doubt that we, like so many other media organizations nowadays, are under growing strain. If you are in a position to support us, please subscribe now.
As a subscriber, you will enjoy unlimited access to our On Point suite of long reads and book reviews, Say More contributor interviews, The Year Ahead magazine, the full PS archive, and much more. You will also directly support our mission of delivering the highest-quality commentary on the world's most pressing issues to as wide an audience as possible.
By helping us to build a truly open world of ideas, every PS subscriber makes a real difference. Thank you.
萨拉索塔—气候变化是世界最紧迫的问题,而在美国,至少左派是认真对待这个问题的。今年早些时候,同为民主党人的纽约州众议员亚历山德里亚·奥卡西奥-克尔特兹(Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez)和马萨诸塞州参议员爱德华·马尔基(Edward Markey)提出了绿色新政(GND)方案,为美国提供了经济去碳化蓝图。但是,尽管越来越多的民主党总统竞争者支持他们的方案,中间派民主党和共和党仍然坚持不同的气候政策方针。
关键的中间派方案符合流行的新自由主义思路,即碳税。其思维很简单:如果你对化石燃料进入经济的入口征税——不管是在井口、矿中还是港口——就能充分捕获污染的社会成本。用经济学的术语,这被称为庇谷税,因为它是为了纠正市场的不良结果,即英国经学家亚瑟·庇谷(Arthur Pigou)所谓的负外部性——在这个例子中,就是要为全球变暖负责的温室气体排放。
作为气候变化的应对之道,碳税立即在横跨整个政治谱系的经济学家中大受欢迎,它也确实有着重要的作用。但它还远远不够。经济想要以经济平等、政治可行的方式实现迅速去碳化,需要绿色新政级别的全面方案。这意味着结合某些基于市场的政策和大规模私人和公共部门投资,并仔细地起草环境监管。
We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.
To continue reading, subscribe now.
Subscribe
orRegister for FREE to access two premium articles per month.
Register
Already have an account? Log in