El fallido plan de paz para Oriente Medio de Bush

Que se haya convocado en Damasco una cumbre del “eje del mal” de Oriente Medio –Irán, Hezbollah, Siria y Hamas- inmediatamente después del llamado del presidente George W. Bush a una conferencia de “moderados” para promover una paz palestino-israelí demuestra una vez más cuán entrelazados están los problemas de la región. El encuentro de Damasco refleja la visión que tiene Irán de la paz árabe-israelí como una amenaza estratégica importante, porque lo condenaría al aislamiento en un contexto árabe hostil libre de su conflicto con Israel. Los iraníes también pretendían que el encuentro forjara una alianza contra un posible ataque estadounidense a las instalaciones nucleares de su país.

Estados Unidos siempre supo que los problemas de Oriente Medio están interconectados, pero, durante años, malentendió sus prioridades, porque no logró ver que si había un principio de Arquímedes para el problema de Oriente Medio, había que buscarlo en la cuestión palestina, no en la “guerra contra el terrorismo”, Irak o la necesidad de una democracia árabe. Hicieron falta seis años de políticas obstinadas de Bush para admitir finalmente que “Irak no es la única cuestión crucial en Oriente Medio”.

La iniciativa de Bush es un esfuerzo desesperado por salvar la posición de Estados Unidos en una región donde está a la defensiva en todos los frentes. Es particularmente irónico que, en un marcado contraste con su propia retórica, el llamado de Bush a una conferencia de paz sobre Oriente Medio sea un llamado a entablar una guerra contra Hamas, el partido que ganó una elección democrática, y hacer las paces con el perdedor, Fatah.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/f97lBDJ/es;
  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now