Tips for the TTIP
After three years of negotiating, the US-EU Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership is simply not where it needs to be – and, without public support, it never will be. Shifting popular opinion will require changes in how trade is conducted and how society adjusts to openness and progress.
MADRID – Three years ago, the United States and the European Union launched negotiations on the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), promising to complete them on “one tank of gas.” But now the talks are running on fumes, with sniping on both sides and the political window for an agreement closing fast.
The obstacles that the TTIP negotiations have run up against are not exclusive to that agreement. They reflect a broader trend – one that demands a fundamental rethink of the prevailing approach to trade and free-trade agreements.
It is no secret that the backlash against such agreements has been gaining traction in recent years. In the US, both presumptive nominees for the presidency – the Democrats’ Hillary Clinton and the Republicans’ Donald Trump – have espoused anti-trade views, with Trump projecting a mercantilist approach unseen in mainstream US political debate since before World War II. Moreover, it looks increasingly unlikely that the Trans-Pacific Partnership, which the US has negotiated with 11 other Pacific Rim countries, will receive congressional support.
We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.
To continue reading, subscribe now.
Get unlimited access to PS premium content, including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, On Point, the Big Picture, the PS Archive, and our annual year-ahead magazine.
Already have an account or want to create one? Log in