Bringing the World Health Organization Back to Health

CAMBRIDGE: Many life and death issues facing developing countries can only be addressed by international joint action. No lone African country, for example, can overcome the crushing burden of malaria, a disease that claims perhaps 1million lives per year, and which causes around 800 million episodes of illness per year. Current scientific knowledge is simply inadequate to face the challenge. The world, instead, relies on the World Health Organization (WHO) to address challenges such as this.

In recent years, however, the United States and other governments have squeezed the budget of the WHO to a point where it can not effectively carry out its global mission. It is desperately important that the world's governments now recommit to raise the budget of the WHO, as one of the most important steps available in the cause of global development and justice.

Start with two points. First, many of the crucial barriers to economic development are scientific rather than purely economic. All of the IMF-World Bank missions in the world are not going to overcome the problems of malaria, or drug-resistant tuberculosis, or even low agricultural productivity in the arid regions of Africa. These problems simply require new scientific and technical approaches.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.


By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.