Comments 9

Les questions que pose la « Brexit » à l’Europe

Mar 21, 2016 Javier Solana

MADRID – Dans trois mois, les citoyens britanniques devront décider s’ils resteront ou non au sein de l’Union européenne. Mais ils ne sont pas les seuls à devoir évaluer leur avenir politique. Le prochain référendum pose aussi deux questions importantes pour le reste de l’Europe.

La première question consiste à savoir quel résultat du référendum les Européens préfèrent ou devraient préférer. Certains ont déjà jeté l’éponge sur le dossier du Royaume-Uni, faisant valoir qu’un partenaire envisageant de quitter l’Union n’est pas, de toute manière, le genre de partenaire dont il voudrait. Que l’on souscrive ou non à cette opinion, il vaut la peine d’étudier cet argument. En fait, ce serait faire preuve de naïveté de ne pas se poser la question suivante : « Retenir à tout prix un membre qui remet en question le principe même de l’intégration européenne est-il réellement dans l’intérêt supérieur de l’Union européenne ? »

En réalité, le débat public britannique sur la souveraineté ne cessera pas après le scrutin. Après tout, même si la majorité répond « oui » à l’Union européenne, un segment de la population qui selon les sondages est non négligeable demeurera convaincu que la Brexit aurait été préférable pour le Royaume-Uni.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To read this article from our archive, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

Featured

The Sino-American Cold War’s Collateral Damage

Oct 19, 2018 Minxin Pei
The End of Scandinavian Non-Alignment

Oct 17, 2018 Carl Bildt
Will Italy Sink Europe?

Oct 17, 2018 Jim O'Neill
The Martyrdom of Jamal Khashoggi

Oct 15, 2018 Daoud Kuttab
The Brexit Endgame

Oct 16, 2018 Robert Skidelsky

Javier Solana

Writing for PS since 2004
97 Commentaries

Javier Solana was EU High Representative for Foreign and Security Policy, Secretary-General of NATO, and Foreign Minister of Spain. He is currently President of the ESADE Center for Global Economy and Geopolitics, Distinguished Fellow at the Brookings Institution, and a member of the World Economic Forum’s Global Agenda Council on Europe.

new comment has been posted. new comments have been posted.

0 Comments on this paragraph, 11 in all 11 Comments on this article

Tony Phuah Mar 24, 2016

"If Brexit, what are the detriments to the UK's bottoms?
If Bremain, what are the benefits to the UK's bottoms?
If Brexit, what are the detriments to the EU's bottoms?
If Bremain, what are the benefits to the EU's bottoms?"
[in Chinese]http://tonyphuah.wordpress.com/2016/03/01/nation-stratum-closer
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Steve Hurst Mar 23, 2016

Whilst this article pruports to be discussing the EU issue objectively it is far from that -

'Indeed, it would be naive not to ask whether retaining a member that is challenging the very principle of European integration would really be in the EU’s best interests.'

So the EU vision is frozen, yup thats a problem. The whole strength of democracy is it allows development in response to chnage

Furthermore how does this view square with the growing tide of dissent with EU vision in a number of EU majors

Here is the central problem with the EU - it wants a federal state but the whole of the population doesnt. As it becomes more and more clear what a federal state entails the population increasingly moves away from this outcome. Furthermore it wants a federal state but is not prepared to accept that a federal state requires ongoing wealth transfer in a structured way

'The problems we are facing did not arise because of European integration.'

Debatable but irrelevent. The point is the EU is incapable of effective response to crisis due to the inflexibility of flawed integration, eg Greece, Schengen, Migrants, Security, Eurozone etc etc. The migrant crisis handling from start to finish has been horrendous. The solution now appears to be paying a non EU party for forced intervention, as though security can be a bought in external service. As these issues have not been sorted they can only return. Greece is due to return very shortly

As far as military expenditure goes many in the EU are not pulling their weight, simple as that

The EU is full of tunnel visionaries who cannot see the light at the end of the tunnel but are convinced it is there. The blind wanting everybody else to be blind so they can lead them

'Brexit would deal a major economic blow to the UK and the EU alike. But that is not all. It would also weaken the security, foreign policy, and international standing of both parties.'

So why was this left to develope to thsi stage, any acknowledgement of the UK position has only come at the last minute when reality dawned. That has only entrenched the 'Leave' UK position. The whole thing whiffs of a body which cannot react only try to dictate
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
John Jones Mar 22, 2016

Power-bloc diplomacy has never worked well; it has often been disastrous. It is high time for us all to grasp the nettle and accept that national or power-bloc armies are a dangerous anachronism.
We must all be prepared for our states (or federations) to surrender their armed forces to global control -or face the consequences. As regards Brexit, as a UK citizen I am also a European and, beyond and above that, a global citizen. I have no desire whatever to feel secure because my ‘side’ is stronger than anyone else. In the nuclear age such feelings would be insane. Unless we can quickly learn to think as tenants of one very fragile planet and act concertedly, there is very little hope for us. The atrocity in Brussels today and the specter of Trump maybe in the White House tomorrow are the writing on the wall
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
christopher tingus Mar 22, 2016

34 murders of innocents, 150+ seriously injured within distance to EU leadership and same NATO headqtrs and you will vote to strenthen the EU and while Karl Guttenberg will take the torch from Merkel and lead the EU and Germany to challenge Tehran while the sitting US biased and tainted Oval Office clasps hands w the cortupt Raul Castro and Barrack Hussein Obama does little more than to spin the same with his co-anchor, good 'ol Ms. Hillary and her willingness as well to prostitute America to line the coffers of the Clinton Foundation while willing share sensitive docs w adversaries, YOU will vote to keep the EU in tact as you are at War w an ideology of Islam which is so contrary to most of the 1.6+ billion Muslims who like Christians, Hebrews, Hindus and others who freely choose their faith w / o imposing another's values and sees clearly the wrong by those who murder in cold blood as barberous im their ways and in front of God who has given no one the Right to kill innocents and by the way, to the obviously warped ideology which seeks the demise of the west, who are you to judge whether one is a non-believer and who are you to bring harm against Christians as you have no right to judge another or harm another and to act and kill innocent human beings for We are all children of God whether the throngs of Christians besieged throughout the Middle East as my Greek Orthodox priest in church on Sunday prayed for so many being brutalized by this same biased ideology!

YOU have no choice to support the leadership of the EU for the tides are changing and Islamic ideology which permits and encourages such harm against anyone....well, while the sophistication and organization and the encrytion methods and so on of the murders of innocent humam beings must NOT be underestimated, those choosing to cowardly hurt the fragile, women and children, you have awoken the giant by your choice of committing murder against another human being, all children of God and it will be a unified EU and the Germans who have replaced a fractured and obviously corrupted US Government who chooses self-serving agenda as a priority over the oath to office and Constitution, closing borders, enforcing laws and maintaining a comprehensive immigration system!

God bless us all!

Christopher Tingus
"Main Street USA"
Harwich (Cape Cod)
Chris.tingus@gmail.com
Skype: christopher.tingus
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
jagjeet sinha Mar 22, 2016

JS deserves the respectable hearing that his impeccable credentials warrant.
As NATO Secretary General, JS played a decisive role - especially during the fiasco in Yugoslavia.
World Affairs have been his forte and like Helmut Schmidt of Germany, JS has a crystal clear mind.
Whatever the bickerings within, a repeat of Yugoslavia is the last thing needed at this hour.
Along with Carl Bildt and Gordon Brown, this troika needs to lead the European effort.
That ensures peace n prosperity in Europe for the next 70 years.
1945 - 2015 brought a rare sanctuary in European history.
That must be preserved - despite every fault line that divides Europeans.
- David Morgan Mar 27, 2016
  
  jagjeet sinha thank you, someone appreciates what the united Europe in its current form the EU has achieved, many decades of peace in Europe. That was why the Iron and Steel Federation between France and Germany was set up to achieve rapprochement between warring countries. So forget the everyday problems as it is fundamentally successful.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
j. von Hettlingen Mar 22, 2016

Javier Solana believes that - irrespective of its outcome - Britain's in-out referendum on its EU membership will cast a long shadow on the future of the Union, posing "two important questions." Firstly, "which outcome Europeans would and should prefer." Indeed, some of us "have already written off the United Kingdom," saying a member state that lacks the sense of solitarity is not worth keeping. Solana makes the point about "whether retaining a member that is challenging the very principle of European integration would really be in the EU’s best interests."
Even if the "yes" vote prevails, there will always be those naysayers, who continue to clamour for more "sovereignty" and "remain convinced" that they would have been better off without the EU. Constant "disagreements" and endless negotiations with Brussels will dominate their agenda "for years to come." However disheartening the reality is, Solana warns us against favouring a Brexit, given the ramifications that both the UK and the EU will suffer. Moreover "it would also weaken the security, foreign policy, and international standing of both parties." He also points out how important it is that the UK - Europe's "biggest military power" - and the EU work closely together, as the current crises and security threats affect us all, and no party alone can't handle them on its own.
The financial crisis has already taken a toll on defence budgets across Europe, and EU leaders "continue to struggle to reach consensus on foreign-policy measures". A Brexit would "further reduce the willingness of EU members to cooperate, resulting in the deterioration of both their security and their remaining international influence."
Solana's second question - "Is EU membership worthwhile" - triggers soul-searching in the UK and the EU, seen as a seed of doubt sowed by nationalist and populist parties in people's minds. He says "centrifugal forces" focus on narrow interests "to the detriment of common action," prompting some governments to take "unilateral measures contrary to EU decisions."
He says national interests erode "the values and principles on which the EU was founded." Hence the 2017 presidential election in France and federal elections in Germany will be followed closely, because these two countries were the founding members of today's EU, and constitute the pillars of its leadership. Any "potential political boost to anti-European forces could have serious long-term consequences."
The author dismisses the blame that Eurosceptics put on the EU for its "myriad problems," saying they "did not arise because of European integration," and they will not go away, whether the EU "is united or not." Indeed, what matters is "how Europe responds to them. The rationale for integration is that collective action is far more effective than unilateral efforts." Before damage is done to undermine the EU, it "should be reaffirmed as an attractive political project" - making "decisive progress toward a more effective, more integrated, and more desirable union." Indeed, this can only be done with reforms.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Robert Winter Mar 22, 2016

You are correct that "The problems we are facing did not arise because of European integration." However, thry did arise in major part because of the manner of integration. Having a common currency without a common central bank or a means for meaningful financial integration has proved problematic, at best. And, having what is at its core a technocratic governance structure with democratic accountability little more than a throw away line will likely preclude ever having strong public support across the EU with its increasingly divergent national interests as perceived by the very different national populations. Those who oppose Brexit -- and notwithstanding the foregoing I am one -- too often leave unaddressed the democratic weaknesses in the EU structure.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
Alisdair Hamilton-Wilkes Mar 21, 2016

"with many favoring a view that holds out the nation-state as the solution to every problem" - WRONG.

More connected democracy and greater political transparency and resulting accountability are the solutions and these are forming the bedrock of the sensible pro-Brexit arguments in the UK.

The arrogant and evasive way in which the EU and UK pro-EU elites avoid addressing the democratic deficit at the heart of the EU and its objectives the more damage will be done to the future relationship between the pro and anti EU constituencies across the entire continent.

Eventually the countries with the greatest desire for and traditions for democracy will break away because the EU is institutionally not capable of reform.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.
stephan Edwards Mar 21, 2016

The EU shot itself in the foot rather thoroughly when it hammered Greece into the ground in order to save the loan books of northern European banks at the expense of the taxpayers. Loans to Greece that never sent a dime they merely transferred the debts from the banks to the taxpayers. That kinda confirmed the EU was being run to benefit the "Elites" and their cronies. Thus the anti EU movement.
- Garrett Connelly Mar 27, 2016
  
  This is my understanding also.
  A new reply to this comment has been posted.
A new reply to this comment has been posted.

http://prosyn.org/UVtGYHx/fr;

Les questions que pose la « Brexit » à l’Europe

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Featured

The Sino-American Cold War’s Collateral Damage

The End of Scandinavian Non-Alignment

Will Italy Sink Europe?

The Martyrdom of Jamal Khashoggi

The Brexit Endgame

New Comment

Email this piece to a friend

Contact us

The Powerlessness of the Most Powerful

What Has Google Ever Done for Us?

China’s Repressed Memory

The Economics of the Climate Crisis

The Sino-American Cold War’s Collateral Damage

The Disruptive Power of Ethnic Nationalism

When Agricultural Workers Go Hungry

Are Britons Really Softening on Immigration?

Cookies and Privacy

Log in/Register