Carl Court/ Getty Images

Reforming the Referendum

Brexit leader Boris Johnson declared in his victory speech that UK membership in the EU could be decided only by “putting it to the people.” Now that the vote has passed, the British government should hold a proper referendum to determine which non-EU future the people actually want.

LONDON – World leaders’ reactions to the Brexit shock included one that shouldn’t be ignored – and from an unexpected source: Russian President Vladimir Putin. Rather than exulting in the latest body blow to the European Union, Putin castigated Britain’s leaders for “arrogance and a superficial approach … to issues that are vital to their country and to Europe as a whole.”

Coming from Putin, this criticism of direct democracy might be dismissed as an authoritarian conceit. But there are states with impeccable democratic credentials that share his wariness, not least Germany, which has a constitutional prohibition on referenda, lest another demagogue should use them, as Hitler did, to extinguish democracy and the rule of law.

Brexit leader Boris Johnson, in his victory speech, offered a different view: the United Kingdom’s membership in the EU could be decided only by “putting it to the people.” So when are referenda appropriate in large modern democracies? The answer is that it depends on the question placed before voters.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

To continue reading, please log in or register now. After entering your email, you'll have access to two free articles every month. For unlimited access to Project Syndicate, subscribe now.

required

By proceeding, you are agreeing to our Terms and Conditions.

Log in

http://prosyn.org/BWuSIdB;

Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated cookie policy and privacy policy.