Más allá del objetivo de los dos grados

BERLÍN – En los círculos relacionados con políticas sobre el cambio climático, existe un amplio consenso en torno al objetivo de limitar el calentamiento global a un máximo de dos grados centígrados por sobre los niveles previos a la revolución industrial. Aun así, a menos que en el futuro cercano haya grandes avances en las negociaciones de las Naciones Unidas y se reviertan las actuales tendencias de emisiones, se trata de una meta casi imposible de cumplir.

Sin embargo, si los líderes mundiales abandonan ese objetivo, deberán tomar una decisión estratégica fundamental sobre la estructura y los niveles de rigurosidad de un nuevo objetivo climático. Así, la política internacional sobre el clima precisa de un cambio de paradigma. El enfoque basado en supuestos científicos de traducir un límite global de temperatura a presupuestos de emisiones nacionales específicos es políticamente impracticable. En lugar de ello, los países con sólidas prioridades para contrarrestar el cambio climático deben promover fórmulas dinámicas para establecer objetivos.

El objetivo de los dos grados es el principal punto de referencia en el debate actual sobre el clima. Por lo general, se considera que un aumento correspondiente de la temperatura media global es el límite más allá del cual los efectos del cambio climático podrían volverse peligrosos. Pero, al contrario de la creencia general, el último informe de evaluación del Panel Intergubernamental sobre el Cambio Climático (PICC) no hizo llamado alguno en torno a esta meta, que desde mediados de los años 90 ha actuado como rumbo y símbolo para establecer un conjunto de medidas ambiciosas pero realistas sobre el cambio climático.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.


Log in

  1. An employee works at a chemical fiber weaving company VCG/Getty Images

    China in the Lead?

    For four decades, China has achieved unprecedented economic growth under a centralized, authoritarian political system, far outpacing growth in the Western liberal democracies. So, is Chinese President Xi Jinping right to double down on authoritarianism, and is the “China model” truly a viable rival to Western-style democratic capitalism?

  2. The assembly line at Ford Bill Pugliano/Getty Images

    Whither the Multilateral Trading System?

    The global economy today is dominated by three major players – China, the EU, and the US – with roughly equal trading volumes and limited incentive to fight for the rules-based global trading system. With cooperation unlikely, the world should prepare itself for the erosion of the World Trade Organization.

  3. Donald Trump Saul Loeb/Getty Images

    The Globalization of Our Discontent

    Globalization, which was supposed to benefit developed and developing countries alike, is now reviled almost everywhere, as the political backlash in Europe and the US has shown. The challenge is to minimize the risk that the backlash will intensify, and that starts by understanding – and avoiding – past mistakes.

  4. A general view of the Corn Market in the City of Manchester Christopher Furlong/Getty Images

    A Better British Story

    Despite all of the doom and gloom over the United Kingdom's impending withdrawal from the European Union, key manufacturing indicators are at their highest levels in four years, and the mood for investment may be improving. While parts of the UK are certainly weakening economically, others may finally be overcoming longstanding challenges.

  5. UK supermarket Waring Abbott/Getty Images

    The UK’s Multilateral Trade Future

    With Brexit looming, the UK has no choice but to redesign its future trading relationships. As a major producer of sophisticated components, its long-term trade strategy should focus on gaining deep and unfettered access to integrated cross-border supply chains – and that means adopting a multilateral approach.

  6. The Year Ahead 2018

    The world’s leading thinkers and policymakers examine what’s come apart in the past year, and anticipate what will define the year ahead.

    Order now