Skip to main content


伯克利—现在,在我书桌的左后角摆着三部新书:布鲁克斯(Arthur Brooks)的《战争》(The Battle)、穆雷(Charles Murray)的《崩溃》(Coming Apart)和埃伯斯塔特(Nicholas Eberstadt)的《匪之国》(A Nation of Takers)。总的来说,它们代表了重要的思想动向,这也恰好是当今美国保守主义对治理经济鲜有建设性意见、在美国选举舞台上频频败北的重要原因。

但让我们回顾历史,看看我们所谓的现代保守主义是如何在19世纪初的英国和法国起源的。一些人——巴斯夏(Frédéric Bastiat)和萨伊(Jean-Baptiste Say)立刻出现在眼前——认为当市场或生产出现了暂时性的干扰时,政府应该安排失业者去建设基础设施。但他们的观点被西尼尔(Nassau Senior)反对,他认为就连食品救济都不应该有:尽管数百万人因爱尔兰土豆饥荒丧命,但“这远远不够。”


We hope you're enjoying Project Syndicate.

To continue reading, subscribe now.


Get unlimited access to PS premium content, including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, On Point, the Big Picture, the PS Archive, and our annual year-ahead magazine.;
  1. bildt69_DELIL SOULEIMANAFP via Getty Images_syriansoldiermissilegun Delil Souleiman/AFP/Getty Images

    Time to Bite the Bullet in Syria

    Carl Bildt

    US President Donald Trump's impulsive decision to pull American troops out of northern Syria and allow Turkey to launch a military campaign against the Kurds there has proved utterly disastrous. But a crisis was already inevitable, given the realities on the ground and the absence of a coherent US or Western policy in Syria.


Cookies and Privacy

We use cookies to improve your experience on our website. To find out more, read our updated Cookie policy, Privacy policy and Terms & Conditions