Il vantaggio degli esperti

LONDRA – Quasi tutti coloro che siedono nel consiglio di amministrazione di Google hanno almeno una laurea in informatica o in ingegneria. Tra questi due rettori universitari ed eminenti studiosi – John Hennessy dell’Università di Stanford e l’ex rettore dell’Università di Princeton Shirley Tilghman – e diversi membri dell’Accademia nazionale di ingegneria e altre illustri organizzazioni. Per Google vale la pena avere dei tecnici ai vertici.

Ma Google è un insolito colosso aziendale promuovendo le prodezze scientifiche e mettendole al vertice della scala aziendale. Oltre a Silicon Valley, sono pochi i massimi dirigenti che incentivano le competenze tecniche nei prodotti realizzati dalle loro società. I board americani sono pieni di MBA, soprattutto di Harvard, mentre le aziende nel resto del mondo avanzato (ad eccezione forse della Germania) sembrano preferire manager professionisti al talento tecnico o scientifico.

Oggi sembra tanto anomalo avere lavoratori specializzati quanto lo era un tempo avere gli scienziati nei board. In passato si pensava che la leadership fosse meno necessaria nelle organizzazioni ad alto coefficiente di conoscenze, dove si presumeva che gli esperti fossero superiori perché motivati dal piacere intellettuale più che dalle motivazioni estrinseche come la crescita dei profitti e gli obiettivi in termini di costi.

To continue reading, please log in or enter your email address.

Registration is quick and easy and requires only your email address. If you already have an account with us, please log in. Or subscribe now for unlimited access.

required

Log in

http://prosyn.org/SzIlDBe/it;
  1. China corruption Isaac Lawrence/Getty Images

    The Next Battle in China’s War on Corruption

    • Chinese President Xi Jinping knows well the threat that corruption poses to the authority of the Communist Party of China and the state it controls. 
    • But moving beyond Xi's anti-corruption purge to build robust and lasting anti-graft institutions will not be easy, owing to enduring opportunities for bureaucratic capture.
  2. Italy unemployed demonstration SalvatoreEsposito/Barcroftimages / Barcroft Media via Getty Images

    Putting Europe’s Long-Term Unemployed Back to Work

    Across the European Union, millions of people who are willing and able to work have been unemployed for a year or longer, at great cost to social cohesion and political stability. If the EU is serious about stopping the rise of populism, it will need to do more to ensure that labor markets are working for everyone.

  3. Latin America market Federico Parra/Getty Images

    A Belt and Road for the Americas?

    In a time of global uncertainty, a vision of “made in the Americas” prosperity provides a unifying agenda for the continent. If implemented, the US could reassert its historical leadership among a group of countries that share its fundamental values, as well as an interest in inclusive economic growth and rising living standards.

  4. Startup office Mladlen Antonov/Getty Images

    How Best to Promote Research and Development

    Clearly, there is something appealing about a start-up-based innovation strategy: it feels democratic, accessible, and so California. But it is definitely not the only way to boost research and development, or even the main way, and it is certainly not the way most major innovations in the US came about during the twentieth century.

  5. Trump Trade speech Bill Pugliano/Getty Images .

    Preparing for the Trump Trade Wars

    In the first 11 months of his presidency, Donald Trump has failed to back up his words – or tweets – with action on a variety of fronts. But the rest of the world's governments, and particularly those in Asia and Europe, would be mistaken to assume that he won't follow through on his promised "America First" trade agenda.