There is a tendency in looking at the eurozone to focus on the crisis du jour, instead of taking the longer-term view. So let’s step back and take a very long term view of the zone, say twelve months.
What will be happening over those months and what decisions will the actors have to make?
I have spent my career in credit, and the most difficult discussion with bond issuers is always the twelve-month “stress scenario”: Assuming you lose access to the unsecured credit markets today, how will you stay alive for the next year? This requires a spreadsheet depicting all expected outflows and all inflows that do not include borrowing money. No one enjoys this exercise.
So let’s look at the peripheral countries’ cashflow over the next year. Outflows consist of (1) budget deficits; (2) maturing long and short term debt; and (3) deposit outflows (bank runs). Budget deficits are generally getting bigger despite austerity, because government revenues are declining. Deposit outflows can be financed by the ECB, so long as all of the banks are adequately capitalized. If they aren’t, the EU can provide the funds for recapitalization via the EFSF/ESM, as it is now doing with Spain and Greece.
That leaves the main problem: maturing debt. None of these countries can borrow at less than 5%. If they refinance their debts at >5%, their current debt levels are unsustainable. If they continue to run deficits and also refund their debt at >5%, they are non-viable. Therefore, at some point over the next twelve months, the peripherals will be forced to seek to refinance their maturing debt using money from the EU.
At present, that money is not on offer. The ECB will lend to solvent banks, but not to impecunious governments. The EFSF/ESM will lend to governments, but its lending capacity is a fraction of the peripherals’ outstanding debt. They can take care of Greece, Cyprus, Portugal and Ireland. But they cannot refinance the debts of Italy and Spain. To rescue Italy and Spain will require eurobonds, which have been repeatedly nixed by Germany and the other AAA countries.
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
So the only thing that we know with certainty is that at some point over the next year either one or more of the peripherals will default and leave the eurozone, or else Germany & Co. will consent to eurobonds. Both outcomes seem quite implausible but, as Lady Thatcher used to say, there is no alternative.
To have unlimited access to our content including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, PS OnPoint and PS The Big Picture, please subscribe
When comparing Ukraine’s situation in 2024 to Europe’s in 1941, Russia’s defeat seems entirely possible. But it will require the West, and the US in particular, to put aside domestic political squabbles and muster the political will to provide Ukraine with consistent and robust military and financial assistance.
compare Russia's full-scale invasion to World War II and see reason to hope – as long as aid keeps flowing.
Current debates about Israeli policy are rife with double standards, leading to absurd decisions like Germany’s recent cancellation of a pro-Palestinian gathering. By quashing legitimate speech and assembly, an Israel-aligned establishment risks inciting precisely the kind of anti-Semitism that it wants to prevent.
worries that the double standards applied on Israel’s behalf will lead to an anti-Semitic backlash.
There is a tendency in looking at the eurozone to focus on the crisis du jour, instead of taking the longer-term view. So let’s step back and take a very long term view of the zone, say twelve months.
What will be happening over those months and what decisions will the actors have to make?
I have spent my career in credit, and the most difficult discussion with bond issuers is always the twelve-month “stress scenario”: Assuming you lose access to the unsecured credit markets today, how will you stay alive for the next year? This requires a spreadsheet depicting all expected outflows and all inflows that do not include borrowing money. No one enjoys this exercise.
So let’s look at the peripheral countries’ cashflow over the next year. Outflows consist of (1) budget deficits; (2) maturing long and short term debt; and (3) deposit outflows (bank runs). Budget deficits are generally getting bigger despite austerity, because government revenues are declining. Deposit outflows can be financed by the ECB, so long as all of the banks are adequately capitalized. If they aren’t, the EU can provide the funds for recapitalization via the EFSF/ESM, as it is now doing with Spain and Greece.
That leaves the main problem: maturing debt. None of these countries can borrow at less than 5%. If they refinance their debts at >5%, their current debt levels are unsustainable. If they continue to run deficits and also refund their debt at >5%, they are non-viable. Therefore, at some point over the next twelve months, the peripherals will be forced to seek to refinance their maturing debt using money from the EU.
At present, that money is not on offer. The ECB will lend to solvent banks, but not to impecunious governments. The EFSF/ESM will lend to governments, but its lending capacity is a fraction of the peripherals’ outstanding debt. They can take care of Greece, Cyprus, Portugal and Ireland. But they cannot refinance the debts of Italy and Spain. To rescue Italy and Spain will require eurobonds, which have been repeatedly nixed by Germany and the other AAA countries.
Subscribe to PS Digital
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
So the only thing that we know with certainty is that at some point over the next year either one or more of the peripherals will default and leave the eurozone, or else Germany & Co. will consent to eurobonds. Both outcomes seem quite implausible but, as Lady Thatcher used to say, there is no alternative.