Tea Party: Vote Obama to Reduce the Federal Budget Deficit

Tea Party: Vote Obama to Reduce the Federal Budget Deficit

Liberals: Vote Romney to Avoid a Recession

Welcome to American politics, also known as the theater of the absurd. If we re-elect President Obama, we'll get deficit reductions, but also a recession in 2013. If we elect Candidate Romney, we'll avoid the recession through increased deficit-spending, but we'll be on a path to national insolvency.

Let me explain these counter-intuitive conclusions.

In 2011, Congress passed and the President signed, as a bipartisan compromise, the Budget Control Act of 2011 (the Act). Under this Act (effective January 1, 2013): Bush era tax cuts will expire, and Pentagon and other spending will decrease. The Act will cut America's budget deficit 40% in 2013, and begin to reduce National Debt as a percentage of GDP by 2015 (Source: CBO).

During this election year, the Republicans' claim they want to replace the Act with even more substantial deficit reductions, by large reductions in most of the social welfare programs. However, the Republicans also plan to extend Bush era tax cuts (and make even deeper tax cuts under Representative Ryan's tax plan), and increase the Pentagon's budget.

The World’s Opinion Page

Help support Project Syndicate’s mission

subscribe now

The Republicans haven't explained how they'll pay for these decreased revenues and increased expenses - except to say they'll change other (unspecified) parts of the budget. It's not clear the Republicans' proposals are even serious since their numbers don't add up (they're short by anywhere between $4.6 to $6.2 trillion over the next ten years).

If President Obama is re-elected and the Republicans retain even a blocking minority in the Senate (they're likely to retain control of both Houses), it's difficult to imagine Congress and President Obama reaching any compromise revisions to the Act between November 2012 and January 2013. So effective January 1, we'll be on the path to deficit reduction, and - as Mitt Romney clearly understands - reducing the budget deficit next year will trigger a recession:

"If you take a trillion dollars for instance, out of the first year of the federal budget, that would shrink GDP over 5 percent. That is by definition throwing us into recession or depression. So I’m not going to do that, of course." - Mitt Romney.

If elected, Romney has committed to: Not cutting the deficit in his first year, extending and deepening the Bush tax cuts (particularly for upper income groups - so-called job creators), and increasing Pentagon spending. A quick calculation shows Romney's first year in office resulting in a deficit at least $600 billion larger than under the likely Obama scenario. And perhaps as much as $1 trillion larger when Romney's new tax cuts and Pentagon budget increases are factored in. Romney's huge expansion of the Federal deficit would prevent a recession, might trigger another economic bubble, but at the risk of long-term national insolvency.

Romney would have little trouble getting his deficit-spending program approved by the Republican Congress. With a Republican President facing a possible recession, Congress will lose interest in deficit-reduction. As with prior Republican administrations, a Congress talking deficit-reduction pre-election, will post-election give tax cuts to the rich, budget increases to the Pentagon (rather than to the Veterans Administration) and spend like partying Secret Service agents in Cartagena.

Think I'm joking? Reagan, Bush 1 and Bush 2 all ran as fiscal conservatives - claiming Democrats were the 'tax and spend' party. But these Republican administrations collectively tripled our National Debt from 30% of GDP - to 90%, and increased Federal spending as a share of GDP (see Charts 1 and 2). Republicans then in Congress never objected.

So -
Liberals: Vote Romney because he's a committed Keynesian who will avoid a recession by deficit-spending. Romney's deficits will come from tax cuts for the very rich and increases to an already-massive Pentagon budget (rather than investments in infrastructure, research and education that would build America's future). Also, Romney's budget plan will put us on a long-term path to insolvency.

Tea Party: Get out there and do everything you can to re-elect Obama! He's your best hope for an aggressive program to reduce the Federal deficit. Not because he wants to. Not because he agrees with you. But because gridlock in Washington will prevent any amendments of the Act's terms. And when the Act takes effect in 2013, we'll be on a path to long-term solvency - but these reductions will involve tax increases and produce a recession.

Aren't American politics grand!

You can follow Steven Strauss on twitter at: @Steven_Strauss or on Facebook at: https://www.facebook.com/Steven.Strauss.Updates

  1. Television sets showing a news report on Xi Jinping's speech Anthony Wallace/Getty Images

    Empowering China’s New Miracle Workers

    China’s success in the next five years will depend largely on how well the government manages the tensions underlying its complex agenda. In particular, China’s leaders will need to balance a muscular Communist Party, setting standards and protecting the public interest, with an empowered market, driving the economy into the future.

  2. United States Supreme Court Hisham Ibrahim/Getty Images

    The Sovereignty that Really Matters

    The preference of some countries to isolate themselves within their borders is anachronistic and self-defeating, but it would be a serious mistake for others, fearing contagion, to respond by imposing strict isolation. Even in states that have succumbed to reductionist discourses, much of the population has not.

  3.  The price of Euro and US dollars Daniel Leal Olivas/Getty Images

    Resurrecting Creditor Adjustment

    When the Bretton Woods Agreement was hashed out in 1944, it was agreed that countries with current-account deficits should be able to limit temporarily purchases of goods from countries running surpluses. In the ensuing 73 years, the so-called "scarce-currency clause" has been largely forgotten; but it may be time to bring it back.

  4. Leaders of the Russian Revolution in Red Square Keystone France/Getty Images

    Trump’s Republican Collaborators

    Republican leaders have a choice: they can either continue to collaborate with President Donald Trump, thereby courting disaster, or they can renounce him, finally putting their country’s democracy ahead of loyalty to their party tribe. They are hardly the first politicians to face such a decision.

  5. Angela Merkel, Theresa May and Emmanuel Macron John Thys/Getty Images

    How Money Could Unblock the Brexit Talks

    With talks on the UK's withdrawal from the EU stalled, negotiators should shift to the temporary “transition” Prime Minister Theresa May officially requested last month. Above all, the negotiators should focus immediately on the British budget contributions that will be required to make an orderly transition possible.

  6. Ksenia Sobchak Mladlen Antonov/Getty Images

    Is Vladimir Putin Losing His Grip?

    In recent decades, as President Vladimir Putin has entrenched his authority, Russia has seemed to be moving backward socially and economically. But while the Kremlin knows that it must reverse this trajectory, genuine reform would be incompatible with the kleptocratic character of Putin’s regime.

  7. Right-wing parties hold conference Thomas Lohnes/Getty Images

    Rage Against the Elites

    • With the advantage of hindsight, four recent books bring to bear diverse perspectives on the West’s current populist moment. 
    • Taken together, they help us to understand what that moment is and how it arrived, while reminding us that history is contingent, not inevitable

    Global Bookmark

    Distinguished thinkers review the world’s most important new books on politics, economics, and international affairs.

  8. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin Bill Clark/Getty Images

    Don’t Bank on Bankruptcy for Banks

    As a part of their efforts to roll back the 2010 Dodd-Frank Act, congressional Republicans have approved a measure that would have courts, rather than regulators, oversee megabank bankruptcies. It is now up to the Trump administration to decide if it wants to set the stage for a repeat of the Lehman Brothers collapse in 2008.