------------------ Glenn Hutchins, Vice-Chairman of the Board, Brookings Institution William Galston, Ezra Zilkha Chair in Governance Studies, Brookings Institution
You list a number of challenges facing America, and assert we can remove these barriers to growth if: Big Business stops ignoring Washington, and politicians do what Big Business recommends. While I agree with you about many of the challenges we face, I disagree that our problem is "Big Business ignoring Washington."
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
Based on the evidence, Big Business isn't ignoring Washington. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce (an umbrella group for America's largest companies) spends more than $60 million per year lobbying Washington. General Electric spends more than $25 million per year lobbying Washington. The top 10 industry lobbying clients (the list is shown below) spend more than $200 million per year lobbying Washington. Indeed, Big Business spends around $3 billion per year lobbying Washington, and employs about 20 lobbyists for every member of Congress.
Big Business gets a good return on the time and money it spends on Washington. On average, for every dollar Big Business spends to lobby for targeted tax benefits, it receives back between $6 and $21 (see 1 and 2 below). As the New York Times noted, one reason General Electric pays no U.S. income tax on its $14 billion per year in earnings is its aggressive lobbying.
Most disturbingly, Big Businesses that lobby distort our regulatory and legal systems. By comparison with non-lobbying firms, firms that lobby face significantly slower government enforcement action in fraud cases (See 3 below).
Leaving aside the question of influence -- why, exactly, should Americans trust the competence of America's Big Business leaders? President Bush's economic policies (which brought our economy to near-collapse) were driven by Big Business leaders. Consider Bush's Treasury Secretaries: Hank Paulson (2006-09, former Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO), John Snow (2003-06, former CSX CEO) and Paul O'Neil (2001-03, former Alcoa Chairman and CEO). Under the guidance of Bush's Big Business leadership team, U.S. unemployment doubled (from percent to 8 percent), and an annual Federal government budget surplus of 1 percent of GDP became a budget deficit of 10 percent of GDP.
Under Bush's Big Business leadership team, the United States significantly reduced bank regulation, trusting our Big Business leaders to take responsibility for their own actions. America's Big Banks took advantage of this lack of supervision to vastly expand their risk-taking. When things went badly, they needed a $700 billion bailout from the Federal Government, and trillions in support from the Federal Reserve (the largest government bailout in America's history). If it hadn't been for Washington's intervention, a number of our largest financial institutions (for example, Citigroup, AIG) would no longer exist to offer Washington their advice.
The American automobile industry was also incompetently managed, and faced liquidation. No Big Business leader offered the vision and financing to restructure the American auto industry. As you may recall, Washington (specifically, the Obama administration's courage and managerial competence) saved the American auto industry.
Big Business' managerial performance in the 2008 financial crisis isn't an inspiring endorsement of advice from, or the managerial competency of, America's largest corporations.
If you feel I'm being unfair to America's Big Business leaders, I'd welcome hearing your thoughts in more detail.
Finally, you comment: "At a recent conference ... one business leader after another expressed deep frustration with our dysfunctional federal government ..."
Perhaps the next time you hear Big Business leaders complaining about "our dysfunctional federal government," ask them how much they spend on lobbying Washington, and whether their vast lobbying dollars help solve America's problems or just further their own private interests? I respectfully suggest that our Big Business leaders' vast spending, on lobbying for their private interests, contributes greatly to making our government dysfunctional.
My point is not that America's Big Business leaders are solely responsible for our current problems -- they aren't. But they've certainly played a role in creating these problems.
To quote President Kennedy: "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."
Perhaps it's time America's Big Business leaders stop asking what Washington can do for them, and ask instead what they can do for their country.
I look forward to hearing from you and participating in a constructive discussion about how we can make America a better place.
Regards,
Steven Strauss
About the Author: Steven Strauss was founding Managing Director of the Center for Economic Transformation at the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). He is an Advanced Leadership Fellow at Harvard University for 2012. He has a Ph.D. in Management from Yale University and more than 20 years private sector work experience. You can follow him on Twitter at: @Steven_Strauss
Sources: All campaign and lobbying data is from www.opensecrets.org, unless otherwise noted. Data on unemployment rates, budget deficits, etc., is from www.wolframalpha.com, unless otherwise specified.
(1) Raquel M. Alexander, Stephen W. Mazza, and Susan Scholz, "Measuring Rates of Return on Lobbying Expenditures: An Empirical Case Study of Tax Breaks for Multinational Corporations," Journal of Law and Policy (2009).
(2) Brian Kelleher Richter, Krislert Samphantharak, and Jeffrey F. Timmons, "Lobbying and Taxes," American Journal of Political Science (2009).
(3) Frank Yu and Xiaoyun Yu, "Corporate Lobbying and Fraud Detection," Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis (2011).
Appendix: Listed below are 2011 lobbying expenditures of the top 10 corporate lobbying clients:
1. US Chamber of Commerce - $66.4 million 2. General Electric - $26.3 million 3. Blue Cross/Blue Shield - $21.0 million 4. ConocoPhillips - $21.0 million 5. American Hospital Assn - $20.5 million 6. AT&T Inc - $20.2 million 7. Comcast Corp - $19.3 million 8. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America - $18.9 million 9. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn - $18.5 million 10. Boeing Co - $16.1 million.
A version of this article was originally posted at the HuffingtonPost
To have unlimited access to our content including in-depth commentaries, book reviews, exclusive interviews, PS OnPoint and PS The Big Picture, please subscribe
Iran’s mass ballistic missile and drone attack on Israel last week raised anew the specter of a widening Middle East war that draws in Iran and its proxies, as well as Western countries like the United States. The urgent need to defuse tensions – starting by ending Israel’s war in Gaza and pursuing a lasting political solution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict – is obvious, but can it be done?
The most successful development stories almost always involve major shifts in the sources of economic growth, which in turn allow economies to reinvent themselves out of necessity or by design. In China, the interplay of mounting external pressures, lagging household consumption, and falling productivity will increasingly shape China’s policy choices in the years ahead.
explains why the Chinese authorities should switch to a consumption- and productivity-led growth model.
Designing a progressive anti-violence strategy that delivers the safety for which a huge share of Latin Americans crave is perhaps the most difficult challenge facing many of the region’s governments. But it is also the most important.
urge the region’s progressives to start treating security as an essential component of social protection.
Big Business Should Stop Ignoring Washington?
Shown below is an open letter to the authors of a recent Fortune article: "Big Business should stop ignoring Washington."
------------------
Glenn Hutchins, Vice-Chairman of the Board, Brookings Institution
William Galston, Ezra Zilkha Chair in Governance Studies, Brookings Institution
Gentlemen,
I read with interest your recent article "Big Business should stop ignoring Washington," and thank you for highlighting an important set of issues.
You list a number of challenges facing America, and assert we can remove these barriers to growth if: Big Business stops ignoring Washington, and politicians do what Big Business recommends. While I agree with you about many of the challenges we face, I disagree that our problem is "Big Business ignoring Washington."
Subscribe to PS Digital
Access every new PS commentary, our entire On Point suite of subscriber-exclusive content – including Longer Reads, Insider Interviews, Big Picture/Big Question, and Say More – and the full PS archive.
Subscribe Now
Based on the evidence, Big Business isn't ignoring Washington. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce (an umbrella group for America's largest companies) spends more than $60 million per year lobbying Washington. General Electric spends more than $25 million per year lobbying Washington. The top 10 industry lobbying clients (the list is shown below) spend more than $200 million per year lobbying Washington. Indeed, Big Business spends around $3 billion per year lobbying Washington, and employs about 20 lobbyists for every member of Congress.
Big Business gets a good return on the time and money it spends on Washington. On average, for every dollar Big Business spends to lobby for targeted tax benefits, it receives back between $6 and $21 (see 1 and 2 below). As the New York Times noted, one reason General Electric pays no U.S. income tax on its $14 billion per year in earnings is its aggressive lobbying.
Most disturbingly, Big Businesses that lobby distort our regulatory and legal systems. By comparison with non-lobbying firms, firms that lobby face significantly slower government enforcement action in fraud cases (See 3 below).
Leaving aside the question of influence -- why, exactly, should Americans trust the competence of America's Big Business leaders? President Bush's economic policies (which brought our economy to near-collapse) were driven by Big Business leaders. Consider Bush's Treasury Secretaries: Hank Paulson (2006-09, former Goldman Sachs Chairman and CEO), John Snow (2003-06, former CSX CEO) and Paul O'Neil (2001-03, former Alcoa Chairman and CEO). Under the guidance of Bush's Big Business leadership team, U.S. unemployment doubled (from percent to 8 percent), and an annual Federal government budget surplus of 1 percent of GDP became a budget deficit of 10 percent of GDP.
Under Bush's Big Business leadership team, the United States significantly reduced bank regulation, trusting our Big Business leaders to take responsibility for their own actions. America's Big Banks took advantage of this lack of supervision to vastly expand their risk-taking. When things went badly, they needed a $700 billion bailout from the Federal Government, and trillions in support from the Federal Reserve (the largest government bailout in America's history). If it hadn't been for Washington's intervention, a number of our largest financial institutions (for example, Citigroup, AIG) would no longer exist to offer Washington their advice.
The American automobile industry was also incompetently managed, and faced liquidation. No Big Business leader offered the vision and financing to restructure the American auto industry. As you may recall, Washington (specifically, the Obama administration's courage and managerial competence) saved the American auto industry.
Big Business' managerial performance in the 2008 financial crisis isn't an inspiring endorsement of advice from, or the managerial competency of, America's largest corporations.
If you feel I'm being unfair to America's Big Business leaders, I'd welcome hearing your thoughts in more detail.
Finally, you comment: "At a recent conference ... one business leader after another expressed deep frustration with our dysfunctional federal government ..."
Perhaps the next time you hear Big Business leaders complaining about "our dysfunctional federal government," ask them how much they spend on lobbying Washington, and whether their vast lobbying dollars help solve America's problems or just further their own private interests? I respectfully suggest that our Big Business leaders' vast spending, on lobbying for their private interests, contributes greatly to making our government dysfunctional.
My point is not that America's Big Business leaders are solely responsible for our current problems -- they aren't. But they've certainly played a role in creating these problems.
To quote President Kennedy: "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country."
Perhaps it's time America's Big Business leaders stop asking what Washington can do for them, and ask instead what they can do for their country.
I look forward to hearing from you and participating in a constructive discussion about how we can make America a better place.
Regards,
Steven Strauss
About the Author: Steven Strauss was founding Managing Director of the Center for Economic Transformation at the New York City Economic Development Corporation (NYCEDC). He is an Advanced Leadership Fellow at Harvard University for 2012. He has a Ph.D. in Management from Yale University and more than 20 years private sector work experience. You can follow him on Twitter at: @Steven_Strauss
Sources: All campaign and lobbying data is from www.opensecrets.org, unless otherwise noted. Data on unemployment rates, budget deficits, etc., is from www.wolframalpha.com, unless otherwise specified.
(1) Raquel M. Alexander, Stephen W. Mazza, and Susan Scholz, "Measuring Rates of Return on Lobbying Expenditures: An Empirical Case Study of Tax Breaks for Multinational Corporations," Journal of Law and Policy (2009).
(2) Brian Kelleher Richter, Krislert Samphantharak, and Jeffrey F. Timmons, "Lobbying and Taxes," American Journal of Political Science (2009).
(3) Frank Yu and Xiaoyun Yu, "Corporate Lobbying and Fraud Detection," Journal of Finance and Quantitative Analysis (2011).
Appendix: Listed below are 2011 lobbying expenditures of the top 10 corporate lobbying clients:
1. US Chamber of Commerce - $66.4 million
2. General Electric - $26.3 million
3. Blue Cross/Blue Shield - $21.0 million
4. ConocoPhillips - $21.0 million
5. American Hospital Assn - $20.5 million
6. AT&T Inc - $20.2 million
7. Comcast Corp - $19.3 million
8. Pharmaceutical Research & Manufacturers of America - $18.9 million
9. National Cable & Telecommunications Assn - $18.5 million
10. Boeing Co - $16.1 million.
A version of this article was originally posted at the HuffingtonPost