WEEKLY SERIES

INTERNATIONAL ECONOMICS

STRATEGIC SPOTLIGHT

GLOBAL FINANCE

ECONOMICS OF DEVELOPMENT

ECONOMIC AND REGULATORY POLICY

ECONOMIC HISTORY

ECONOMIC PERSPECTIVES

PUBLIC INTELLECTUALS

GLOBAL OUTLOOK

REGIONAL EYE

SPECIAL SERIES

PROJECT SYNDICATE

AUTHOR'S BIO

George P. Fletcher

George P. Fletcher

George P. Fletcher is Cardozo Professor of Jurisprudence at Columbia University. His latest book is Romantics at War: Glory and Guilt in the Age of Terrorism.
RECENT COMMENTARIES FEATURED COMMENTARIES MOST READ COMMENTARIES
  • The War of the Words

    Series: The Worldly Philosophers
    2007-01-30
    Nowadays, words are often seen as a source of instability. The violent reactions last year to the caricatures of the Prophet Muhammad published in a Danish newspaper saw a confused Western response, with governments tripping over their tongues trying to explain what the media should and should not be allowed to do in the name of political satire. Then Iran trumped the West by sponsoring a conference of Holocaust deniers, a form of speech punished as criminal almost everywhere in Europe. ... read
    Comments: 0   Recommended: 0   Read: 20121
  • Sense and Nonsense about Disproportionate Force

    Series: The Worldly Philosophers
    2006-08-11
    As the war in Lebanon continues, the term “disproportionate force” is being bandied about as if some crystal clear principle of international law lay behind it, telling us when force is disproportionate and why it is illegal. But civilian deaths as a result of military combat are not enough to say that “disproportionate force” has been used. Nor has that standard, whatever it is, been met if more children die on one side than the other. So what, then, does “disproportionate force” mean, and what is its place in the law of war? ... read
    Comments: 0   Recommended: 0   Read: 23720
  • The Beginning of the End for Guantánamo

    Series: The Worldly Philosophers
    2006-07-07
    The “war on terror” has forced democracies to grapple with the extent to which they can afford to protect the civil rights and liberties of both their citizens and foreigners. The debate has been most intense in the United States, where the refrain that the Constitution is not a “suicide pact” and that national security can justify extraordinary measures is heard repeatedly. Some measures – unauthorized searches of bank records and wiretapping of telephone calls – compromise the liberty of all. Others – most notoriously, the confinement of roughly 450 alleged Muslim fighters in Guantánamo Bay – impinge on people thought to be the enemy. ... read
    Comments: 0   Recommended: 0   Read: 22263
  • Milosevic and Hussein: Trial by Farce

    Series: The Worldly Philosophers
    2006-03-15
    Trials of war criminals were once serious business. Recall the photographs of Herman Goering and Rudolf Hess sitting glumly in the dock at Nuremberg. Some Nazi leaders were even hanged after relatively short but fair trials. ... read
    Comments: 0   Recommended: 0   Read: 24780
  • Defining Terrorism

    Series: The Worldly Philosophers
    2005-07-13
    Every age has its enemies.  In the mid-20th century, Fascists were the evildoers.  After WWII, Communists became civilization’s public enemies.  The bombings across London of July 7th have shown that terrorists remain today’s designated masters of evil.... read
    Comments: 0   Recommended: 0   Read: 45598
  • Guilt and Shame in Abu Ghraib

    Series: The Worldly Philosophers
    2004-05-21
    Whenever governments lose moral authority, as when their police seize evidence in violation of the Constitution, their case for conviction suffers. As the late US Supreme Court Justice Louis Brandeis said, government must remain the "omnipresent teacher" of our highest ideals. In the Abu Ghraib scandal, the army and the Bush administration have hardly been good teachers, and the public and the media have also been complicit. How, then, can the collectively guilty bring charges and single out some suspects as individually guilty? ... read
    Comments: 0   Recommended: 0   Read: 21112
  • The Solid but Regrettable Argument for Israel's Security Fence

    Series: The Worldly Philosophers
    2004-02-25
    The International Court of Justice has completed its hearings on the legality of the barrier Israel is building in the occupied West Bank. This is an isolated question among many larger issues that await a negotiated peace agreement. ... read
    Comments: 0   Recommended: 0   Read: 19275
  • Defining Terrorism

    Series: The Worldly Philosophers
    2003-10-16
    Every age has its enemies. In the mid-20th century, Fascists were the evildoers. After WWII, Communists became civilization's nemesis. Now terrorists have become the designated masters of malevolence. The word "terrorism" appears in law books and legislation around the world. Various civil sanctions apply to "terrorist organizations," and it can be a crime to assist one. ... read
    Comments: 0   Recommended: 0   Read: 17476
  • Sense and Nonsense about Self-Defense

    Series: The Worldly Philosophers
    2002-10-22
    If patriotism is, as Samuel Johnson suggested, the last refuge of a scoundrel, then self-defense is the last refuge of an aggressor. The justification of self-defense comes readily to the lips of both paranoids and those who reasonably wish to defend themselves against imminent attack. The argument for America's putative invasion of Iraq is, of course, self-defense, that is, the need to shield itself and its allies against Saddam Hussein's possible use of weapons of mass destruction. ... read
    Comments: 0   Recommended: 0   Read: 16340
The Boundaries of Anti-Semitism close
items per page
1  2