 |
War and Peace by Shlomo Ben-Ami |
 |
Crossing Cultures by Ian Buruma |
 |
 |
 |
The Statesmen's Debate by Castaneda, Haass, Rocard |
 |
Anatomy of the Global Economy by J. Bradford DeLong |
 |
Net World by Esther Dyson |
 |
The Rebel Realist by Joschka Fischer |
 |
Capitalism Then and Now by Harold James |
 |
The Peacemaker by Richard Holbrooke |
 |
Global Warning by Bjorn Lomborg |
 |
European Observer by Dominique Moisi |
 |
Of Might and Right by Joseph S. Nye |
 |
History in Motion by Chris Patten |
 |
Roads to Prosperity by Dani Rodrik |
 |
The Unbound Economy by Kenneth Rogoff |
 |
Economics and Justice by Jeffrey D. Sachs |
 |
 |
Finance in the 21st Century by Roubini, Shiller |
 |
The Ethics of Life by Peter Singer |
 |
 |
Transatlantic Perspectives by Feldstein, Sinn |
 |
I Dissent: Unconventional Economic Wisdom by Joseph E. Stiglitz |
 |
Against the Current by Robert Skidelsky |
 |
Awakening India by Shashi Tharoor |
 |
The Next Wave by Naomi Wolf |
SANTIAGO – In 1986, opposition journalist José Carrasco Tapia was dragged from his home in Santiago, Chile, by one of General Augusto Pinochet’s death squads. He was shot 13 times in the back of his head and dumped in a cemetery, joining a macabre roll call of Latin American reporters brutalized for daring to speak out during the 1970’s and 1980’s.
During that time, kidnapping, torture, and murder had a stranglehold over the Latin American press; stenography was an infinitely safer choice for those reporting the news. As Latin America became increasingly democratic in the years since then, more reporters chose to investigate instead of retyping government press releases.
Particularly by targeting government corruption, brave journalists made raiding the public till more of a gamble than a birthright – and angered many of the corrupt. Today, too many Latin governments, fearful of the media’s ability to expose misdeeds, have altered their tactics but remain determined to limit press freedom.
Latin American journalists may face a diminished threat of murder nowadays, but many still confront a gauntlet of challenges designed to control them. Behind closed doors, governments wield financial incentives and regulatory powers to mute media criticism and twist editorial content in their favor.
Without a critical press, Latin America’s undeniable advances toward real democracy – development of an informed, empowered citizenry and governments respectful of the legitimate boundaries of power – will be endangered, even as formal electoral trappings become more routine.
There is an alarming pattern of press manipulation throughout the region, from Honduran authorities cutting off a national radio station’s telephone service to Argentine officials shuttering a printing press. To varying degrees, local and national officials in these countries, and in Colombia, Chile, Costa Rica, Peru, and Uruguay are collectively rewriting the authoritarian playbook.
Even more widespread than indirect repression is the corrupting pressure of government money. Across Latin America, advertising from the public sector is critical for the financial survival of newspapers and broadcast stations, but especially for local outlets. In Colombia, the routine is simple: journalists who subsist on income derived from selling advertising space to government agencies call officials in the morning to get their story; later, when they must attempt to sell the same officials advertising, they find out the real cost of independent news coverage.
Likewise, in 2004, Costa Rica’s president decreed that his administration stop advertising in the country’s leading daily newspaper, in retaliation for critical coverage. In 2006 and 2007, Peru’s housing minister used government advertising contracts to tilt coverage of his ministry and himself in national newspapers.
Some governments practice an even more direct method of suborning favorable coverage. In Honduras, direct government payments to journalists are common, as are minimal or non-existent salaries for reporters. Some officials even require journalists to sign contracts mandating favorable coverage of government activities.
Throughout the region, government officials shut out those they regard as troublemakers and manipulate procedures for issuing broadcast licenses to benefit political allies or silence independent voices. As a result, self-censorship chills entire newsrooms, and many noncommercial or alternative media are denied access to the airwaves.
All but the most courageous remain silent; with the threat of ruin for their paper or station, the risks that reporters run are no longer primarily their own. At risk is the emerging diversity of opinion and reporting that has begun to invigorate the region’s traditionally staid and monopolistic media industry.
The picture is not all grim, and, ironically, reporting on news manipulation has helped galvanize politicians in some countries to create better and more enforceable rules of the road.
Steps like fair, competitive, and transparent public-sector contracting procedures, and civil service, rather than political control over allocation of government advertising funds would go a long way, especially combined with good reporting, to protect the media against officials’ persistent temptation to control what the public may know.
Carrasco Tapia died for his vision of critical oppositional journalism. It would be a tragedy if those who still want to control the media win by taking their tactics underground, behind closed doors. The threat they pose may be less dramatic, but it is no less pernicious.
Roberto Saba is executive director of the Association for Civil Rights in Argentina and Robert O. Varenik is the acting executive director of the Open Society Justice Initiative. The two organizations recently released The Price of Silence, a report on media censorship in Latin America.
Copyright: Project Syndicate, 2008.
www.project-syndicate.org
I think that your silence about Venezuela or Cuba, to name a few, is suspicious. Those countries got more issues with the journalists than the ones you name.
Plus, the supposed censure to the colombian media is not very clear. If you got proof, please add it, or the people may think that your arguments are based in non-confirmed rumors. And that's not good.