Sunday, October 26, 2014
3

China’s Risky Finances

BEIJING – In the coming years, China’s government will have to confront significant challenges to achieve stable, inclusive, and sustainable economic growth. But, with mounting fiscal and financial risks threatening to derail its efforts, policymakers must act quickly to design and implement prudent, forward-looking policies.

The most significant medium- and long-term threat to China’s fiscal position lies in the system of implicit guarantees that the central government has established for local-government debt. In the wake of the global financial crisis, local governments borrowed heavily from banks to support China’s massive stimulus program, amassing ¥10.7 trillion ($1.7 trillion) worth of debt by 2011.

China’s leaders hope to control potential risks stemming from local-government investment vehicles (LGIVs) by limiting bank lending. The balance of bank loans to LGIVs increased only slightly in 2012, to ¥9.3 trillion, from ¥9.1 trillion in 2011. And the China Banking Regulatory Commission has called on banks to retain last year’s LGIV loan quotas for 2013, and to ensure that the overall balance of loans to LGIVs does not exceed the 2011 year-end total.

But LGIVs obtained a massive amount of financing in 2012 by issuing bonds and trust loans. This includes ¥250 billion in local-government bonds, ¥636.8 billion in urban-investment bonds, and technical cooperation trust-fund projects totaling ¥501.6 billion, representing year-on-year increases of ¥50 billion, ¥380.6 billion, and ¥247.9 billion, respectively.

Even with these funds, however, local governments have struggled to make ends meet. Tax reforms implemented in 1994 caused local governments’ share of national fiscal revenue to decline steadily, from 78% in 1993 to 52% in 2011. Over the same period, however, their share of total government expenditure increased from 72% to 85%.

The need to fill the resulting gap has forced local governments to depend on land sales. But land-related income has plummeted over the last two years, from 32% of total revenue in 2010 to 20% last year. Measures mandated by the central government to control surging real-estate prices will continue to reinforce this trend, increasing pressure on local-government revenues.

The risk stemming from local-government debt is exacerbated further by massive amounts of non-explicit debt acquired through arrears, credits, and guarantees. When a local government is no longer able to service its debt, the central government will have to place its own fiscal capacity at risk by assuming the responsibility.

China’s financial stability is also under threat, as lenders turn to unofficial channels to circumvent tighter government regulations on the formal banking system. Perhaps the biggest risks stem from China’s rapidly growing shadow banking system.

Shadow banking can be conducted through trust loans (extended by trust companies), entrusted loans (company-to-company credits brokered by financial institutions), bank acceptances (company-issued drafts or bills that are endorsed by banks), and corporate bonds (debt securities issued by companies directly to investors). These instruments’ combined worth reached ¥5.9 trillion last year, led by corporate bonds (¥2.3 trillion).

New lending by trust companies – which rose by more than 400% last year – is generating significant solvency risk in China, given that it is frequently extended to higher-risk entities, including real-estate developers and LGIVs. A spike in defaults could destabilize the entire financial system and trigger an economic downturn. And trust loans tied to LGIVs ultimately enjoy the same implicit guarantee from the central government as official bank loans.

Regular banks, too, are trying to evade new regulations by ramping up off-balance-sheet lending. Indeed, it is increasingly common for banks’ off-balance-sheet lending to exceed newly issued balance-sheet credit. In 2011-2012, such lending grew by ¥1.1 trillion, reaching ¥3.6 trillion (23% of total bank financing), while balance-sheet lending increased by only ¥732 billion.

But the former is usually implicit and uncertain, making it vulnerable to default. If faced with such losses, banks might choose to protect their reputations by using official funds for repayment, transferring the risk onto their balance sheets.

More generally, the rapid expansion of credit risks increasing inflationary pressure and fueling the formation of asset bubbles. Conversely, when the monetary authority tightens credit too quickly, asset prices become more volatile, resulting in more non-performing loans and triggering economic shocks.

China’s government must implement prudent macroeconomic policies now to minimize escalation of these risks later. Medium- and long-term fiscal stability will require policies that account for the growing disparity between fiscal revenues, which are suffering from slowing GDP growth, and expenditures, which will be driven up by structural tax cuts and increased social-welfare spending.

In order to manage growing pressure on public finances, China must establish highly efficient public-budget and fiscal-restraint systems. To this end, the government must tighten financial supervision, improve budgetary management, and enhance the operational efficiency of fiscal policies.

China also needs a new financing model for infrastructure projects. The current system relies heavily on LGIV loans and fiscal expenditures. But local governments cannot continue to rely on revenue from land sales to repay their debts or support current spending. More stable financing channels and stronger enforcement of operating standards are essential to support rapid urbanization.

As prudent fiscal and financial policies gradually stabilize China’s economy, monetary policy must remain neutral. Loosening monetary policy would increase significantly the risks stemming from local-government debt and shadow banking, while tightening monetary policy would fully expose those risks, posing a serious systemic threat.

With the right balance of vision and caution, China’s leaders can tackle the buildup of fiscal and financial risk. If they fail to act decisively, China’s leadership of the future global economy will hang in the balance.

Hide Comments Hide Comments Read Comments (3)

Please login or register to post a comment

  1. CommentedParrain Boursorama

    The best model for expanding Alternative Energies and Environmental Protection globally is through using market equilibrium, whereas governmental subsidies and fiscal stimulus to be just supplementary

  2. CommentedJonathan Lam

    Gamesmith94134: China’s Risky Finances

    When a local government is no longer able to service its debt, the central government will have to place its own fiscal capacity at risk by assuming the responsibility. It is risky only if you do not understand its limits. I think Mr. Bernanke would understood the shadow banking system well through his experience with the EU banks; and we contemplate on the policy and laws how we are buying the banks with huge debts and no relief on the write-off or bankruptcy. This is a risky finance if you must answer on the convertible and turn yourself into a shareholder of amount of debts and keep the bank running. Just like Mr. Bernanke answered to the committee yesterday, he said, ’I don’t know.’ If there is no escape to such risk, we must rely on its governmental policy or banking rules to guide us out of this sinkhole. Did Spain or Portugal sound off the cut of services and workers make any sense in the austerity program? They got blame for the crisis.

    It was Chinese central bank scale back to the 2011 level, but the local and corporate will run on its Shadow Banking System to keep it off the balance sheeting. Perhaps, Lending by trust companies rose by more than 400% last year – is generating significant solvency risk in China, given that it is frequently extended to higher-risk entities, including real-estate developers and LGIVs. it is how China or Mr. Li would take the case to appeal in the China-US trade agreement, and both sides must restrain itself to drive off the risk of default in lurching on to the economic downturn or even financial crisis. Why isn’t there a shrinking crown on the Monkey King?

    “The impact of the PBOC’s liquidity crunch operation is very clear: targeting shadow banking but maintaining regular bank lending,” said Shen Jianguang, chief Asia economist at Mizuho Securities Asia Ltd. in Hong Kong. The surge in the share of bank loans in aggregate financing reflects “a severe decline in shadow-banking activities,” he said. (By Bloomberg news)

    We are all in deep mud in lesser of a prayer, and I am sweating on this risky finance. Walk softly and carry a big stick.

    May the Buddha bless you?

  3. CommentedKevin Yao

    If central government is still in control of most the country, thus leaving little freedom to people, the implicit guarantees will continue, as those from parents to the children.

Featured