Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space
3

Africa’s Urban Challenge

NAIROBI – My mother, like her mother, her grandmother, and so on, was born into poverty in the rural village of Rarieda, Kenya. I, too, was born in the village, and lived there until it was struck by a brutal famine when I was two years old. With no food, money, or opportunities, my mother did what thousands of African villagers do every day: she moved us to the city in search of a better life. But, given the lack of jobs and housing in Nairobi, we ended up in Kibera, one of Africa’s largest slums.

Located just a couple of miles from downtown Nairobi, Kibera is a heavily polluted, densely populated settlement composed of informal roads and shacks with corrugated tin roofs. Kenya’s government does not recognize Kibera, there is no sewage system or formal power grid. Its residents, estimated to number anywhere from a few hundred thousand to more than a million, do not officially exist.

Kibera is just one example of the consequences of the rapid urbanization that is gaining momentum worldwide. More than 44% of developing-country residents already live in cities. The Population Reference Bureau estimates that by 2050, only 30% of the global population will remain in rural areas. But few have stopped to consider this shift’s implications for families like mine.

When people think of Africa, they often focus on the hardships of village life – a perception reflected in iconic images of African women on their daily excursions to fetch water. But an increasing number of people – already nearly 300 million – are facing the harsh reality of the urban slum, where resources are scarce and economic opportunities are elusive. More than 78% of the urban population in the world’s least-developed countries, and one-third of the global urban population, lives in slums.

Nairobi is a dynamic and growing city, with shopping centers, restaurants, and Western-style companies catering to Kenya’s emerging middle class. Yet no one knows how many people live there. According to the last (highly politicized) census, completed in 2009, Nairobi has a population of over three million; but it is probably closer to five million, with a large percentage living in slums.

It is these people, Nairobi’s poorest residents, who build the buildings, staff the restaurants, drive the taxis, and power the city. (From the age of 12 until I was 22, I was part of this group, working at construction sites and in factories.) Indeed, without the poor, Nairobi could not function for a single day.

Nevertheless, they remain all but invisible, with no political voice. The world’s enduring perception of Africa as a village exacerbates slum dwellers’ plight, keeping them off the global development agenda.

Every day, more people arrive in Nairobi, lured by the promise of employment, resources, and a better life, only to realize that they are not equipped to survive there and that their children will grow up in a slum. At least half of those living in urban slums are under the age of 20. Without access to education, this generation – which will soon be the majority – has little hope of ever escaping its straitened conditions.

But for how long will a majority serve a minority? For how long will it accept a lack of water, sanitation, education, and dignity?

Urban slums worldwide will soon reach a tipping point, with young people rejecting the lives that they have been offered. Their power lies in their numbers – more than half of the world’s youth shares their fate – and in their anger. They will rise up, refusing to accept their status as second-class citizens of ever-expanding urban settlements, and they will destabilize countries like Kenya, undermining efforts to build more stable, prosperous societies.

Cities are not just Africa’s future; they are its present. Unless collective action is taken now to transform cities like Nairobi into the drivers of economic development and sources of opportunity that they are supposed to be, they will become a tinderbox of perpetual inequality. For the sake of the millions of people like my mother – and, more important, for the sake of their children and grandchildren – we must fulfill the promise that attracts the poor to cities in the first place.

Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space
Hide Comments Hide Comments Read Comments (3)

Please login or register to post a comment

  1. CommentedChris Baulman

    When the ownership model takes hold (whether ownership be corporate or private) what happens to the "inefficient" farmers is that they are pushed off their land by industrialisation.

    Given land ownership & the industrialising, corporatising and globalising of the food chain that follows, the cat is already out of the bag. It is time for the world to reconsider its responsibility to the people who this model displaces in terms of the housing security they loose.

    In industrialised & industrialising nations, people who for generations past had enjoyed at least the basic security of a roof overhead and a patch of land for food must then win a place in the globalised market place. In the cities where employment is increasingly more competitive, they must rent from an owner. The communal model which had provided land security for them and for future generations is being replaced by an ownership model in the name of efficiency. No compensation can replace that security.

    There are growing numbers are living in slums (right now 863 million people, a considerable increase compared to the 760 million in 2000)

    Under the welfare provisions in some industrialised nations, welfare recipients are demonised & welfare is under threat from the competition (now global) which is intrinsic to the ownership model.

    I think that at the very least, the advocates & beneficiaries of the ownership model have a duty to build an alternative to "welfare" or cold charity into their model.

    My suggestion is for an urban public land provision in a model to create better urban environments for all. see http://bit.ly/S4EjvG

    Chris Baulman
    @landrights4all

  2. CommentedAnestis Ioannidis

    I was always thinking about Africa when emerging ideas about growth and development came into play among the works of great economists, statesmen and enterpreneurs. The idea am offering is to assign a political leader of Kenya the responsibility of assembling a group of national experts frm the fields of economics & statistics, banking, energy, civil infrastructure and help them develop a coherent and comprehensive plan for the country's development. This plan will entail a thorough study of the current state of the country's development in terms of education, economic sectors, and culture, so that it will be able to assess with metrics and specific measurements where the cuntry lies and where it is destined to be. Similarr undertakings like Dubai inclusive of the urbanisation of entire territories is possible for Kenya as well. It is easy to estimate how many families exist and how many houses are required, how many children are available to secure a decent education, how many agricultural, energy, mining, or services business are needed to secure the creation of new economy for Kenya and abandon slums forever. There are great institutions like World Bank, European Bank for Restructuring and Development, and countless other finance institutions who make undertake the funding of similar projects and invite experts from across the globe to deliver a state of the art economy for the whole of Kenya. It is market makers who decide who will develop and who will not and great leaders among them that undertake the responsibility for similar undertakings. Just take the initiative, put it all on paper and it will come to you. Start today working on it is not a bad idea for there will be noone else except you to embrace it and materialise it.

  3. Commentedm r

    One needs to be extremely politically incorrect to comment on this wonderful article, where the author himself is a shining example of goodness. His question/ challenge, "But for how long will a majority serve a minority? For how long will it accept a lack of water, sanitation, education, and dignity?"- has a simple answer- FOR EVER and ever more. Oozing out population as a "political tool" is always doomed- a society betters with efforts, humility and love- not turmoil, violence or apathy. We need more like this Article's author, in this world.

Featured