Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space
Email | Print

Ground the Drones in 2013

LAHORE – Although 2012 saw an accelerating drawdown of United States and NATO forces’ in Afghanistan, a grim aspect of that decade-long war – reliance on air strikes by unmanned drones – continued unabated. Indeed, those attacks were stepped up, with America’s use of drone warfare in Pakistan reaching an unprecedented height over the past year. With President Barack Obama re-elected and no longer facing the pressure of a campaign, it would be in America’s interest – and certainly in the interests of my country, Pakistan – to use the first year of his new term to de-escalate the violence.

America’s drone strikes in Pakistan reflect an arrogant frame of mind that fails to distinguish between the guilty and the innocent, between the perpetrator and the afflicted, and between the criminal and the aggrieved. By banishing all trappings of justice, this mindset is oblivious to the suffering of the peace-loving civilians who comprise the vast majority of those living in Pakistan’s tribal areas.

The US drone strikes have left behind a long trail of death of innocent civilians, with no one being held accountable. These remote-controlled flying machines are programmed to decimate, brutally and indiscriminately. It is shameful that a country known for its democratic values and its unparalleled commitment to human freedom should stoop so low as to kill innocent men, women, and children.

As a result, instead of winning hearts and minds, the US, with the constant humming of killer drones in the air, is driving fear into every living soul in the tribal areas. Indeed, the bloody irony is that the strategy is utterly counter-productive; the people of the tribal areas, with their warrior past, end up joining the militants, justifying their actions as jihad against the forces occupying Afghanistan and their helpers in Pakistan.

Indeed, according to a recent report by researchers at New York University School of Law and Stanford Law School, the people in the areas targeted by the drone campaign are being systematically terrorized. The drone strategy constitutes a campaign of terror – highly effective terror in which even funerals of drone victims have been targeted. In one particularly notorious case, 40 maliks (tribal leaders) holding a jirga (tribal assembly) were burned in an indiscriminate attack.

Alongside many luminaries around the world, former US President Jimmy Carter has condemned Obama’s barbaric drone policy. But the complicity of Pakistan’s government is equally reprehensible. According to WikiLeaks, former Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani approved the US drone strikes, saying: “I don’t care if they do it as long as they get the right people. We’ll protest in the National Assembly and then ignore it.” President Asif Ali Zardari went even further, saying that he did not care about the “collateral damage.”

So Pakistan’s government has failed in its principal responsibility, enshrined in its constitution, to safeguard the lives and property of its citizens, as well as the country’s security and sovereignty. More than 40,000 citizens have been killed since the beginning of the US war in Afghanistan, because Pakistan’s government criminally collaborates with forces that facilitated its rise to power. And, in the face of ongoing military operations, most schools in Waziristan have remain closed for the past 7 years, depriving a generation of children of education and opportunity.

The road to peace in South Asia runs through restive Waziristan. Despite countless sacrifices in the face of the drone strikes’ arbitrary cruelty, the resolve of the tribal areas’ people remains undented. While they continue to seek peace, they are not willing to compromise their honor and self-respect, however daunting the challenges they confront.

The true face of their cultural patrimony and proud traditions must be brought to the world’s attention, so that their dream of peace with honor can be realized. But this can happen only when the US and Pakistani governments disengage from their “war on terror.” Indeed, only when Pakistan is no longer perceived as fighting a US war will local militants stop thinking of the conflict as a jihad against foreign intervention. Peace will come when the tribal people, in their hundreds and thousands, no longer see a reason to fight.

In short, the drone strikes constitute a flawed policy that has only strengthened anti-US sentiment and the forces of extremism in Pakistan. America’s killing machines have failed to subjugate the area’s proud people – a failure that underlies the US decision to withdraw from Afghanistan by 2014. I believe that the withdrawal should come even sooner, so that the US can avoid leaving behind a legacy of animosity that may continue to haunt it for generations.

Only a rapid change of course by the Obama administration in 2013 can begin to counteract the enmity toward the US that has been generated by more than a decade of its forces’ lethal presence in the region. America’s drone war, with its wanton destruction of families and communities, is deepening that antipathy. To get peace in Afghanistan, indeed all of South Asia, the US needs to give peace a chance!

Reprinting material from this Web site without written consent from Project Syndicate is a violation of international copyright law. To secure permission, please contact us.

VisitYear in Review 2012

  • Avatar for Joseph E. Stiglitz

    A Year on the Brink by Joseph E. Stiglitz

    The two main surprises in 2012 were the slowdown in emerging markets, which was slightly sharper and more widespread than anticipated, and Europe’s embrace of some truly remarkable reforms – though still far short of what is needed. Looking to 2013, the biggest global economic risks are there and in the US.

  • Avatar for Christine Lagarde

    The Future Global Economy by Christine Lagarde

    A world that is bound closely together must be a world that works closely together if it is to prosper together. We are multiple players, but we are engaged in a single game – a game that must be cooperative, not simply competitive.

  • Avatar for Kaushik Basu

    The Emerging Economies’ Eurozone Crisis by Kaushik Basu

    For emerging economies, medium- to long-term growth prospects are bright. Easing short-term jitters will require a clear and credible program for returning high-income economies, especially those in Europe, to a sustainable fiscal path.

  • Avatar for Guido Mantega

    Brazil’s Economic Revolution by Guido Mantega

    In 2012, Brazil, beset by fallout from the global economic crisis, undertook bold measures to reinvigorate growth, including interest-rate reductions, tax reform, and steps aimed at stimulating private investment. More important, the government’s policies will have a permanent – indeed, revolutionary – impact on Brazil’s economy.

  • Avatar for Bill Gates

    The Optimist’s Timeline by Bill Gates

    A decade ago, many people believed that the proliferation of mobile devices in Africa would mean a short leap to digital empowerment. But digital empowerment is a long and ongoing process, and the mere existence of cellular technology does not immediately change how poor people meet their basic needs.

  • Avatar for Jim O'Neill

    Emerging World Rising by Jim O'Neill

    The US will face recurring challenges with the “fiscal cliff” until financial markets pressure policymakers into more radical deficit reduction. But, despite this and associated growth disappointments, the global economy will perform better in 2013 than many people expect, owing to emerging countries' rising share of global output.

  • Avatar for Nassim Nicholas Taleb

    More Skin in the Game in 2013 by Nassim Nicholas Taleb

    In an opaque system, operators have an incentive to hide risk, taking upside without downside. And there is no possible risk management method that can replace having skin in the game – particularly when informational opacity is compounded by informational asymmetry.

  • Avatar for George Soros

    Europe’s Crisis of Values by George Soros

    Far from being a voluntary association of equals, the euro is now held together by hierarchy and harsh discipline. Instead of European fraternity and solidarity, hostile national stereotypes proliferate, giving rise to extremist forces that gained ground throughout the continent in 2012.

  • Avatar for Peter Sutherland

    The Bilateral Threat to Free Trade by Peter Sutherland

    The Doha Round of global trade talks appears to have died this year, almost without a whimper. While a small portion of the project may be saved, the essential reality is that this is a unique failure in the history of multilateral trade negotiations, which have transformed the global economy since World War II.

  • Avatar for John Vickers

    The Great Bank Debate by John Vickers

    Structural reform of banks does not solve all problems, but, at least for the UK and the rest of Europe, it is a key part of the overall reform package for the financial sector. Now, five years on from the start of the crisis, the debate about how to achieve a more stable, loss-absorbent banking system has finally begun.

  • Avatar for Anat Admati

    The Great Bank Escape by Anat Admati

    Corporate decisions taken in the name of shareholder value often benefit only those whose wealth is closely tied to the firm's profits, and may be harmful to many shareholders. If policymakers and regulators do not strengthen their reform efforts, taxpayers and shareholders – not bankers – will suffer the consequences of the next crisis.

  • Avatar for Haruhiko Kuroda

    Asia’s Hard Road by Haruhiko Kuroda, Changyong Rhee

    Next year will present significant challenges and new responsibilities – political, economic, and social – for developing Asia. The path to sustainable, inclusive economic growth will be difficult, but it will also entail exciting opportunities for Asia and for the rest of the world.

  • Avatar for Daron Acemoglu

    Is State Capitalism Winning? by Daron Acemoglu, James A. Robinson

    Avatars of liberal capitalism like the US and the UK continued to perform anemically in 2012, while many countries that rely on state capitalism have not only grown rapidly and steadily over the last several decades, but have also weathered recent economic storms with surprising ease. So, is it time to update the economics textbooks?

  • Avatar for Shinzo Abe

    Asia’s Democratic Security Diamond by Shinzo Abe

    Peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Pacific Ocean are inseparable from peace, stability, and freedom of navigation in the Indian Ocean. Japan, as one of the oldest sea-faring democracies in Asia, should play a greater role – alongside Australia, India, and the US – in preserving the common good in both regions.

  • Avatar for Abdullah Gul

    Crisis and Transformation by Abdullah Gul

    Turkey’s immediate neighborhood will continue to dominate the global policy agenda in 2013. To its north, Europe is at a crossroads, with ramifications that extend well beyond the confines of the EU, while an irreversible quest for dignity, freedom, democracy, and peace is altering the political landscape to its south.

  • Avatar for Leon E. Panetta

    America’s Pacific Rebalance by Leon E. Panetta

    The US military has entered a period of historic change after more than a decade of war following the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001. The key change is a strategic "rebalance" toward the Asia-Pacific region, reflecting its countries' central role for global security and prosperity in the twenty-first century.

  • Avatar for Juan Manuel Santos

    The Last Guerrillas by Juan Manuel Santos

    The Colombian government is committed to ending five decades of internal armed conflict by any means possible. The talks currently underway between the government and the FARC have the potential to bring the violence to an end, bolstering Colombian development efforts and contributing to regional peace and stability.

  • Avatar for Pierre Moscovici

    A Year of Reckoning for France and Europe by Pierre Moscovici

    France’s economic performance has been lackluster during the past ten years, particularly with respect to competitiveness, debt sustainability, public spending, and the labor market. But the government has vowed to make significant progress in each of these areas over the next five years – beginning in 2013.

  • Avatar for Michael J. Sandel

    The Moral Limits of Markets by Michael J. Sandel

    Almost without realizing it, we have drifted from having market economies to becoming market societies. A market economy is a tool for organizing productive activity, while a market society is a place where almost everything – from our bodies to our politics – is up for sale.

  • Avatar for Turki bin Faisal al-Saud

    How to Win in the Middle East by Turki bin Faisal al-Saud

    Analysts the world over are assessing the situation in the Middle East in 2012 in terms of the region’s "winners" and "losers." But, in the bloody, hostile miasma of the Middle East, being a “winner” in any sense of the word is fallacious.

  • Avatar for Mark Mazower

    Weimar 2013? by Mark Mazower

    In Europe, where national economic failure once led to the collapse of democracy itself, people are now asking if it could happen again. Communism and fascism may have been discredited since then, but we should not be complacent merely because we cannot imagine the alternatives.

  • Avatar for Imran Khan

    Ground the Drones in 2013 by Imran Khan

    Although 2012 marked the beginning of the end of US and NATO forces’ presence in Afghanistan, reliance on air strikes by unmanned drones escalated. Now that Barack Obama no longer faces the pressure of campaigning, he would be wise to use the first year of his new term to end America's indiscriminate and barbaric attacks.

  • Avatar for Nina L. Khrushcheva

    The History of Russia’s Future by Nina L. Khrushcheva

    The harsh policies that have allowed Russian President Vladimir Putin to maintain a stranglehold on Russia have ensured the country’s decline. As 2013 begins, Russia is back on its treadmill of history, treating the past as prologue – and thus wasting its resources and blighting its people's lives.

  • Avatar for Mehdi Khalaji

    The Enduring Egypt-Iran Divide by Mehdi Khalaji

    The Muslim Brotherhood’s ascent to power in the aftermath of Egypt revolution in 2011 initially inspired hope of renewed diplomatic relations with Iran. But, despite shared ideological principles, significant political obstacles continue to inhibit bilateral cooperation.

  • In 2012: The Year of the Locusts, Project Syndicate’s special Year in Review, the world’s leading economists, policymakers, political leaders, strategic thinkers, and public intellectuals provide an exclusive, sharp-eyed look at the last 12 months – and compelling analyses of the trends that will shape events in 2013.

Exit from comment view mode. Click to hide this space

Comments (0)

You need to login in order to leave a comment. If you do not yet have an account, please register.

close

The two commenting options explained

Watch a 1 minute video
to discover how you can comment on the entire article or a specific paragraph. The two images below also explain the two ways of commenting.

1) Entire article comment
Once logged in, simply click inside the comment box where it says "Enter text here." Enter and post your comment.

2) Paragraph comment
Please log in first. Then click to the left of the desired paragraph. Your cursor will automatically move to the comments box. Enter and post your comment.

Show comments of
  1. Commented

    Tony U

    Mr. Khan, either intentionally or unintentionally, ignores that fact that Pakistan has, for years, funded and supported terror elements in Afghanistan -- the very groups killing NATO troops and Afghan civilians. Mr. Kahn also ignores the fact that the Pakistan government is grossly corrupt and wholly incapable of defeating its own domestic insurgency, which thrives in the region neighboring Pakistan.

    Should Pakistan's military take control of the situation, drones strikes would not be needed. Should Pakistan become an honest participant, and stop playing both sides, the drone strikes would not be needed. Should Pakistan abandon its strategic policy of maintaining a weak Afghanistan neighbor to allow for an exit during another disastrous war with India, drones would not be needed.

    Mr. Kahn is disingenuous to implicitly suggest that Pakistan is an honest, forthright, transparent partner. Rather, the numerous madrasas which breed successive generations of youthful extremists, uncontrolled Waziristan region, ISI's continued campaign of Taliban support, and Pakistan's conniving ulterior motives in dealing with both Afghanistan and the US, sadly ripen the stage for drone strikes -- which Pakistan itself has tacitly supported.

    This article is garbage. An emotional, uninformed, dishonest argument which completely ignores the reality of the situation and the numerous failings of his home country.

  2. Commented

    Ken Presting

    Mr. Khan makes several important points, but his claim that "the resolve of the tribal areas' people remains undaunted" may require clarification. There is also evidence that the tribal areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan are brutally oppressed and exploited by Taliban forces as well as (other) criminal opportunists.

    I for one wish to praise the moral standards of Mr. Khan, Medea Benjamin, and others who are standing up for drone strike victims. Still, I believe there is a more nuanced view.

    I believe the intended targets of US drone strikes are in fact criminals, not enemy combatants. Striking against them would be justifiable as a police tactic, if there were a competent international police authority to oversee those tactics and punish those who abuse deadly force. Hiding among innocent tribal populations is a deliberate tactic, comparable to hostage-taking.

    I agree that drone strikes as conducted now are killing innocent people. I must admit that I cannot see much moral difference between the universally regretted collateral damage of conventional military attacks, and the drone casualties. At least drones kill fewer people than bombs do.

    In sum, it is a disservice to international public safety and to international justice to call for "grounding the drones." Instead, we should build the international institutions which can place this dangerous technology under proper supervision. Until that is accomplished. the US military should enlist the US judiciary for oversight.

  3. Commented
    66%

    Vamsi Dharanikota

    This is pretty classy propaganda. Once the drone strikes stop Pakistani establishment will get back to its ways that led to a lot of terrorists finding safe havens in Pakistan. I know there are innocents dying as in any war but for the bigger picture and lasting peace in this region, USA is doing the right thing.

    1. Commented

      Moctar Aboubacar

      "The bigger picture" is a scary concept. You are also implying that giving the United States carte blanche to bomb another country is a viable policy to deter Pakistan from going back to it's "old ways".

      For countries that wish to remain civilized, there is no real choice here; the ends simply do not justify the means.

    2. Commented

      V S

      Who gave the US carte blanche? The Pakistan government. If they can take care of the problem, no need for drones. When the Pak govt and army and ISI bring this upon themselves, what is to be done? Is there anyone explaining to the Taliban that the ends don't justify the means when they hide behind civilians and use ambulances for attacks? Why is the ethics argument one-sided and the role of the Pak govt/army/ISI down played or absent?

    3. Commented

      V S

      Who gave the US carte blanche? The Pakistan government. If they can take care of the problem, no need for drones. When the Pak govt and army and ISI bring this upon themselves, what is to be done? Is there anyone explaining to the Taliban that the ends don't justify the means when they hide behind civilians and use ambulances for attacks? Why is the ethics argument one-sided and the role of the Pak govt/army/ISI down played or absent?

    4. Commented

      V S

      a) Who gave the US carte blanche? The Pakistan government. If they can take care of the problem, no need for drones. Why not address this to Pak govt?
      b) Drones are an alternative to Pak army action. So, lets not label this as US agenda only, which is a useful argument for political ends that Imran has in Pakistan. For all you know, drones are saving Pak army lives. US doesn't have an agenda anymore after finding Bin Laden. Pak and Afghanistan need to take care of terrorists on their soil. Cessation of drone attacks will cost Pak and Afghanistan more than it will cost the US. That is the only solution here for the benefit of all, Pak, Afghans.
      c) Is there anyone explaining to the Taliban that the ends don't justify the means when they hide behind civilians and use ambulances for attacks? Why is the ethics argument one-sided? Where is the ethics arguments for the lives lost by having Taliban subjugate civilians?

Email this article

Your name is required.

Your email is required.


Your friend's name is required.

Your friend's email is required.


A message is required.